Current Projects
Drones: license to kill?
After more than a decade of unchallenged deployment of Predator drones to kill suspected enemies, US President Barack Obama recently signed off an executive order to address civilian casualties in US operations involving the use of force. “The [policy] is based on our national interests, our values and our legal obligations,” says the executive order issued on July 1. “This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person”, it says however. Through the order, Obama has tried to provide a legal cover and justification for drone strikes, which have largely been considered illegal by international human rights activists. The US administration has also tried to address the issue of civilian casualties caused by the drone strikes meant for targeting terrorists. There has been widespread criticism of the killing of innocent civilians in such strikes, and the policy suffers from several inherent flaws and legal implications. Firstly, these attacks constitute blatant violation of the sovereignty of other countries. Secondly, the acts also violate the international humanitarian law. Thirdly, you cannot hold the operators of drones responsible for innocent victims. At least 256 identified civilians have been killed in strikes in Pakistan In many cases, nobody really knows whether those killed were terrorists or innocent non-combatants. That is why a number of countries including China, Russia, the UN, and human rights organizations have demanded of the US to make public the details of its covert operations in Pakistan, Yemen, Syria, Iraq and Somalia. Fourthly, the executive order only mentions the inherent right of self-defense, with no care for international rule of law, human rights, social and political consequences and sovereignty of other countries. Fifthly,...
The Drone War – July 2016
Afghanistan The Bureau recorded 28 US strikes in July, killing at least 219 people - all allegedly members of various armed groups, including the Taliban and Islamic State. US Air Force data showed American strikes had increased in June, in part a response to new rules brought in by President Obama on June 16 allowing greater leeway in proactively targeting the Taliban. It appears the rate of strikes has increased again with the Air Force Times reporting the US released 70 missiles or bombs in one week in July. It released 94 in all of June and 89 in May. The Bureau is collecting data on individual strikes in Afghanistan, summarised above. However not all strikes are reported in open source material. The US Air Force publishes an aggregate summary of strikes in Afghanistan without any casualty information, which we have reproduced below. July numbers will be published in August. The Bureau's timeline of events in the drone war in Afghanistan so far in 2016. A database of all US strikes recorded by the Bureau in Afghanistan since 2015. Pakistan More than two months have passed since US drones last hit in Pakistan, on May 21. The Bureau's timeline of events in the drone war in Pakistan in 2016. A database of all US drone strikes recorded by the Bureau in Pakistan from 2004 to the end of May 2016. Yemen Three US strikes hit Yemen in July killing at least seven alleged al Qaeda fighters. The US military put out a press release confirming it conducted two of the strikes, which included casualty figures. The Bureau's timeline of events in the drone war in Yemen in 2016. A database of all US drone strikes, air strikes and missile strikes recorded by the Bureau in Yemen since 2001. Somalia There were no US strikes reported in Somalia in July. The Bureau's timeline of events in the drone war in Somalia. A database of all US drone strikes, air strikes and missile strikes recorded by the Bureau in Somalia since 2007. This Report originally appeared in The Bureau of...
The Drone War – July 2016
Afghanistan The Bureau recorded 28 US strikes in July, killing at least 219 people - all allegedly members of various armed groups, including the Taliban and Islamic State. US Air Force data showed American strikes had increased in June, in part a response to new rules brought in by President Obama on June 16 allowing greater leeway in proactively targeting the Taliban. It appears the rate of strikes has increased again with the Air Force Times reporting the US released 70 missiles or bombs in one week in July. It released 94 in all of June and 89 in May. The Bureau is collecting data on individual strikes in Afghanistan, summarised above. However not all strikes are reported in open source material. The US Air Force publishes an aggregate summary of strikes in Afghanistan without any casualty information, which we have reproduced below. July numbers will be published in August. The Bureau's timeline of events in the drone war in Afghanistan so far in 2016. A database of all US strikes recorded by the Bureau in Afghanistan since 2015. Pakistan More than two months have passed since US drones last hit in Pakistan, on May 21. The Bureau's timeline of events in the drone war in Pakistan in 2016. A database of all US drone strikes recorded by the Bureau in Pakistan from 2004 to the end of May 2016. Yemen Three US strikes hit Yemen in July killing at least seven alleged al Qaeda fighters. The US military put out a press release confirming it conducted two of the strikes, which included casualty figures. The Bureau's timeline of events in the drone war in Yemen in 2016. A database of all US drone strikes, air strikes and missile strikes recorded by the Bureau in Yemen since 2001. Somalia There were no US strikes reported in Somalia in July. The Bureau's timeline of events in the drone war in Somalia. A database of all US drone strikes, air strikes and missile strikes recorded by the Bureau in Somalia since 2007. This Report originally appeared in The Bureau of...
Pak-Afghan Ties: Can CPEC be a CBM?
Negatives continue to dominate the Pakistan-Afghanistan conversation. The Afghan government remains unhappy with Pakistan over the Haqqani network. On August 1, it officially “regretted” the installation of a new gate at Torkham, accusing Pakistan of violation of centuries-long traditions, despite repeated assertions by President Ashraf Ghani and his colleagues that Afghanistan be treated as an equal, sovereign member of the UN and not be burdened by the weight of history and traditions. Stop repeated references to history, Afghan officials suggest but then bring up the history of the Durand Line when Pakistan talks of border management. On July 31, Kabul also expressed open displeasure over a Taliban delegation’s recent Beijing visit, asserting that China should not provide “a platform” to groups that are involved in the killing of Afghans. On its part, Pakistan, too, has been upset over the derailment of the Quadrilateral Contact Group’s peace efforts following the May 21 drone killing of Mullah Mansoor. Both China and the US, the other two members are also concerned about the literal standstill in the peace process. The terrorists on the other hand are having a ball of a time. They continue to pile misery on innocent non-combatants. This context has thrown up numerous challenges to all those who would want at least the bilateral dialogue to formally resume. The Afghan ambassador in Islamabad, Omar Zakhilwal is among those who would like to push for some semblance of normal talks between the two countries. Despite noises and the formal regret out of Kabul over the Torkham gate, it was reportedly the ambassador’s initiative that helped extinguish the raging fires which also helped Pakistan continue the construction of the gate. Undeterred by the deteriorating relations, Zakhilwal believes that despite all odds, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) probably offers the best entry point for the resumption of the Pak-Afghan talks. A discussion and some...
Fanatics Are All The Same
Last March, during an Umrah visit to Saudi Arabia, I was disturbed after witnessing the mutaween (religious police) forcing people to pray and harassing women to cover up. Meanwhile earlier this year, Tehran announced that the city’s Gashte Ershad (the “guidance patrol”) had their mandate expanded. The city’s police chief, General Hossein Sajedi Nia, stated that “noise pollution, unsafe driving, disturbing girls and incorrect hijab” would be punished. This is, reportedly, a common announcement before the summer months, but this year the 7,000-strong force would be undercover with powers to enforce dress codes and even impound cars if occupants are not sufficiently covered. Clearly, they had not received the memo highlighting the Quranic passage upholding that there was no compulsion in religion. The situation appears no different with secular fanatics. While the religious police in Muslim lands are busy enforcing religious rules, the secular police clearly don’t want to be outdone. Years ago, I came face to face with secular liberal fanatics at the Swissotel, The Bosphorus in Istanbul, Turkey. As I completed my lap in the swimming pool, I caught a glimpse of what appeared to be my wife being escorted out of the pool by hotel staff. We were on our honeymoon, minding our own business, when unbeknownst to us some political drama had been brewing in the background. Two other patrons at the five-star hotel had complained to the pool staff about my wife. The staff asked my wife if she could leave the pool. My wife, who by nature is much more passive than I, had obliged. I climbed out of the pool, rushed over to her to find out what had transpired. “They are saying that I am not dressed appropriately,” said my wife. I made my way to the counter and inquired as to what the issue was. The one in charge appeared worried and clearly did not want a confrontation. One of them sheepishly informed me that someone had complained about my wife’s swim attire. Not one to back off, I...
Facing Moral Blindness in Kashmir
The vicious cycle of curfew, strikes, nocturnal raids and indiscriminate use of force in India-held Kashmir continues unabated for the fourth week. On July 8, 2016 government forces killed Burhan Wani, a young rebel commander in his early 20s in Kashmir’s Kokernag area. A dapper, swashbuckling leader, who efficiently leveraged social media, Burhan’s death innervated Kashmiri youth, who poured out on streets in thousands to express their anger. Despite a strict curfew imposed by the government in Srinagar, close to 300,000 people attended Burhan’s funeral prayers. Reports suggested that mourners poured in from far-off hamlets — on bicycles, tractors, load carriers, motorcycles and on foot. Fifty back-to-back janazas of the slain rebel were offered. Earlier this year when Mufti Muhammad Sayed, the then chief minister of India-held J&K died, less than 3,000 people attended his funeral. The contrast could not have been starker for the person in the thick of this all — Mufti’s daughter and the current chief minister, Mehbooba Mufti. More than 50 boys have been killed and thousands injured during three weeks of intense clashes in IHK. At the centre of public anger, Ms Mufti has been booed recently as she made a rare public appearance. Her ministers have been stoned in several places. In fact, a photo-op attempt with the kin of a few boys killed in police firing, resulted in her being dubbed as the ‘condolence queen’ — someone who watches hysterically as young kids get shot at and killed wantonly. More than 50 boys have been killed and thousands injured in Kashmir during the latest upsurge in violence. The police there aided by the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and Indian army has used live ammunition to break up protests. The use of ‘non-lethal’ pellet guns to control crowds has proven especially disastrous. Scores of young men have lost their eyesight and hundreds others have sustained serious injuries due to the ‘pellet terror’. The aim to inflict maximum...
Kashmir Crisis: Dialogue not violence will resolve issues
Popular Unrest has started breathing down the necks of main stream politicians. Their space in South Kashmir is shrinking. On July 31 National Conference (NC) leader from Anantnag, Iftikhar Hussain Misger, quit his party and pledged support for the “freedom struggle”. A replay of early 1990s when there were public denouncements by mainstream political workers. Chairman Hurriyat Conference (G) Syed Ali Geelani on August 1, 2016 defied the restrictions to lead a ‘pro-freedom and anti-India graffiti’ protest outside his Hyderpora residence. Police have detained dozens of Hurriyat leaders and senior members to stop them from holding anti-India and pro-freedom protests in their respective areas. As the state continues its oppression against Kashmiri Muslims, Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti watches on; elected to represent a local Kashmiri, she sits and watches the daily death of a Kashmiri. A trust badly betrayed. Mehbooba has turned into Mother Teresa and has gone global in her advice to the Kashmiri people. It is unfortunate that the CM should see solution in Economy and Education and not in the promised vote of Kashmiri people, waiting to vote on the Delhi agreement with Srinagar made on 27 October 1947. Present education system is a failed system. So is the political dispensation that has failed in mainstreaming an army of unemployed youth, who gradually age and become unemployable. Mehbooba has said that violence had been rejected globally as a means to achieve political objectives and has urged for a dialogue. Dialogue of course is a solution. We have already moved from dialogue to a programme under the supervision of the United Nations. She should advocate remainder part performance by the Government of Kashmir at Srinagar and the Government of Delhi as provided under UN mechanism to prefer a free vote under UN supervision to either endorse the temporary agreement or to reject it. It will be helpful if Mehbooba stopped her cavalcade and addressed the people who...
CHINA WATCH [July 25-31]: CM Punjab in China, CPEC Work Updates
The week of July 25-31 was dominated by the Punjab CM’s visit to the China during the Punjab-Qingdao Business Seminar, news of a CPEC project running aground, and CPEC gaining additional traction in the international community. Provincial Concerns Federal Minister for Planning Ahsan Iqbal, while addressing the Senate last week, said that the grievances of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and Balochistan regarding the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) had been successfully addressed.[1] This is a highly subjective statement, as the grievances may be considered addressed by the government, but not by the other stakeholders. In fact, continued statements from provincial leaderships continue to claim that they are being treated unfairly under the CPEC initiative. KP Chief Minister Pervaiz Khattak will also visit China soon[2], and his statements and stance preceding and following that meeting will be of great significance. Senators last week also made the call for the government to make the CPEC agreement with China public, as it would also improve transparency and accountability.[3] Work on CPEC To make matters worse, it was reported that a power project under the CPEC had run aground as the government was prioritizing projects in Punjab.[4] “The $2.1-billion, 878-kilometre-long Matiari-Lahore Transmission Line was planned to supply 4,000 megawatts of electricity produced from coal in Sindh to cities in Punjab,” said one report. “This scheme was among the priority projects that China and Pakistan wanted to complete by December 2018 in the first phase of the CPEC construction.” Ahsan Iqbal was quick to try and quell any qualms, saying that any issues would be resolved soon. He argued that transmission lines will not matter much if there is no power to run through them, and while a compelling argument, this will undoubtedly cast a long shadow on the government’s ability to handle CPEC related projects. A major piece of news last week was the signing of a total of seven...
Human Rights Education is a Critical Part of Recruit Training Program, DPO Charsadda
The KP Police is going through the process of reformation with several significant steps aimed at reducing gaps between the public and police and fears of approaching police. The aspects of human rights of citizens – as embedded in the constitution of Pakistan – has been a special consideration in the recruit training program. The recruitment system of KP Police is ever more transparent; free from any sort of political influence. The reforms in the KP Police have significantly reduced the crime ratio in the province. These were the remarks made by Mr. Sohail Khalid, District Police Officer (DPO), Charsadda during a public forum on police reforms at TMA Hall, Charsadda. Mr. Fahad Riaz Khan, District Nazim, Charsadda also spoke during the forum on the impact of police reforms in benefitting the general public and addressing the trust deficit. The event was attended well with houseful of participants including the members of community with diverse backgrounds, lawyers, local government representatives, media, academia, youth representatives and women. The forum was part of the project “Ulasi Police” an awareness and advocacy campaign undertaken by the Center for Research and Security Studies (CRSS) – as part of USAID Small Grants and Ambassadors’ Fund Program – to strengthen the rule of law in KP province by promoting and disseminating the significant police reforms aimed at incorporating local communities’ policing needs and international human rights standards. The endeavor aims to tackle the trust deficit between the public and police, help KP police become an accountable and community-focused police force. Mr. Sohail Khalid said that the reforms has so far been instrumental in reducing public-police gaps and improved peoples’ access and approach to Police without any fear and hesitation. The reforms have three broad categories with initiatives for i) Capacity Building of Police, ii) Structural Changes and Reforms and iii) Community Engagement and Policing....
Pakistani Politicians, FO Talking Same Old Things on Kashmir: Salman
Former foreign secretary Salman Bashir said on Thursday that Pakistan did not have any option for strategic partnership, except China, and now it was looking towards Russia too. Speaking at roundtable titled “Troubled Neighbourhood: Pakistan’s Options” organised by the Centre for Research and Security Studies (CRSS), he said that Pakistan’s civil service structure had collapsed. Indian bureaucracy was working efficiently, but Pakistan’s top bureaucrats had rotten. Pakistani politicians have not even thought about this issue, he said. About the Kashmir issue, Bashir said that Pakistani politicians and Foreign Office were talking the same old things. He said that Pakistan should highlight the human rights violations and the use of pellet guns by the Indian security forces in the Indian-Occupied Kashmir. This is a violation of Geneva Conventions as well. “Pakistan has been unable to unlock geo-economics because it has acted as a security state, but that is true for India as well. They keep spending enormous amounts on defence,” he said. “We as Pakistanis have done a lot, suffered a lot. Pakistan has tried to match external expectations, but it’s time to get out of that schoolboy mindset and be on our own,” he added. Dr Moeed Yusuf, associate vice president at the Asia Centre, earlier said that strategic location had only brought conflict to Pakistan. He said that Pakistan had done only a few things to broaden its alliances. It did a fantastic job to strike a balance in relations with Iran and Saudi Arabia. He said that Pakistan did feel wronged and worried about the world tilting in favour of India. He said that information revolution had made the soft power much more important than ever. He said that Pakistan’s image remained smeared by negative things despite being a front-line ally of the United States. He said that Pakistan’s policy was reactive. He said that India was far better than Pakistan in terms of narrative, geo-economics, realpolitik, and substitute...
TOP STORIES
TESTIMONIALS
“
I am also a member of National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Information and Broadcasting. Recently, we held a meeting with the Director General of Radio Pakistan and we told them to initiate such local programs (like Constituency Hour) in regional languages to educate and inform people. Even Indian Radio can be heard in FATA which is being used for propaganda purposes and must be closed. Therefore, we should launch some standard and quality programs like CRSS that will change the taste of the listeners.