On November 6, another man, Syed Tufail Haider was killed by a police officer Faraz Naveed in prison on false accusations of blasphemy in Gujrat, Punjab province of Pakistan.  District Police Officer (DPO) Gujrat, Rai Ijaz Ahmad while talking to media said that Haider was killed because he hurled abuses at Naveed and it had nothing to do with blasphemy.

Moreover, the accused was also a mentally retard, who had been taken into custody many times earlier and later freed when nothing substantial was found against him. Originally belonging to district Jhang of Punjab, Haider had come to Gujrat to meet his relatives who did not receive him and thus was wandering in the streets scuffling with people and taken into custody by police.

Meanwhile, earlier on November 4, a Christian couple – Shehzad and his spouse Shama – were beaten to death and their bodies burnt in the brick kiln where they worked. Their crime; allegedly desecrating a copy of the Holy Quran. The incident took place at the town of Kot Radha Kishan, some 60 kilometers (KM) southwest of Lahore, capital of Pakistan’s most populous Punjab province.

This latest incident shows the mounting incidents of violence perpetrated under the cover of Pakistan’s Blasphemy laws, despite several protests and proposals by jurists and human rights watchdogs to bring about substantial changes to the laws to prevent their abuse.

The table below provides a cursory look at the number of cases related to blasphemy, including 22 people who have been convicted to death but are still awaiting executions.

Blasphemy Cases – 1953- November 7, 2014

A similar case has shocked Pakistan in September 2014 when Muhammad Asghar, a 70-year old British, was shot and wounded by a prison guard at Adiyala Jail, Rawalpindi. The mentally ill Asghar was sentenced to death for claiming to be a prophet.

Pakistan’s blasphemy laws continue to stoke fears. Critics often say that most of the accused usually are the victims of abuse of this law. Blasphemy is a serious offence and punishable to death according to article 295-c of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC). Article 295-C states:

“Whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by visible representation or by any imputation, innuendo, or insinuation, directly or indirectly, defiles the sacred name of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine”.

Since the inception of blasphemy laws in 1991, CRSS report indicates that 61 persons have been extra judicially murdered in the country.  Among them were nine women as well. Two of these extra judicially murdered persons were Iqbal Butt and Muhammad Imran, who were slain even after getting acquitted by the court. Meanwhile, four people were also injured in an attempt of extra judicial murder.

Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Member National Assembly (MNA) Sherry Rehman submitted a private member’s bill in 2010 seeking amendment to Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. The bill was drafted to provide proportionate penalties for each offence by reducing terms of imprisonment and removing the life sentence and death penalty entirely. However, she later withdrew the bill which then Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani said “was according to party policy.”

In January 2011, then Governor of Punjab Province Salmaan Taseer was killed in capital city, Islamabad, by his own guard for supporting Asia Bibi convicted for blasphemy and seeking reforms to the Blasphemy laws. Furthermore, later that year in March, Shahbaz Bhatti, minister for minority affairs, was also assassinated for supporting Asia Bibi and raising his voice against Pakistan’s blasphemy laws.

Even Justice Iqbal Hameed-ur-Rehman the one member tribunal appointed by the government to investigate the 2009 Gojra riots, when religious Zealots burnt Christian Colony for alleged blasphemy in Gojra, Punjab province, where 8 people died including four women and a child after interviewing 543 persons said in its report, “It is vehemently objected that our law segregates Muslims from non-Muslims and prevent non-Muslims of having much control of their lives. The system fosters injustice, sectarian violence and violence between religions. In addition it is also propagated that the authorities do little to prevent attack on minorities or to punish the perpetrators of religion-inspired violence. As far as the objection about segregation nature of the above Penal Laws is concerned, though it is not the whole truth yet, it is reality that some provisions provide protection only to the Muslims. Section 295, 295-A, 296, 297 and 298   possess generality, whereas, Sections 295-B, 295 C, 298-A, 298-B and 298-C are specifically enacted for protection of religious rights of the Muslims”.

“Although, sections 295-B, 295-C, 298-A, 298-B and 298-C were inserted in PPC but no safety valve for avoiding misuse of the same was provided in the relevant provisions of Procedural law i.e. section 196 & 196-B CrPC (Criminal Procedure Code). Misuse of the said provisions of substantive law can be avoided if adequate amendments are made in sections 196 & 196-B CrPC, he further added.

Former Chief Justice of Supreme Court Tasaduq Hussain Jilani in a landmark judgment of June 19, 2014 directed that,

a)      Federal government should constitute a taskforce tasked with developing a strategy of religious tolerance

b)       A Special Police Force to be established with professional training to protect the places of worship of minorities

c)      National Council for minorities’ rights shall be constituted

d)      Appropriate steps to be taken by federal government to ensure that hate speeches in social media are discouraged

Speaking on the abuse of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws, Peter Jacob, a human rights activist, said, “Federal and provincial ministries should take the responsibility of monitoring, protecting and defending cases against persons accused of blasphemy. The successive governments are responsible for allowing abuse of blasphemy laws and pervasive insecurity and they have ignored resolving them continuously. While the state cannot be absolved of its responsibility to protect victims from extrajudicial accesses and institutional justice, defending the blasphemy victims has become an uphill task that the victims and their sympathizers cannot engage effectively. Some of the blasphemy cases, for instance, Salamat Masih, Rimsha Masih and Dr. Akhtar Hameed Khan, where government shared some of the responsibility, were handled well.”

Jacob further stated, “Civil society and human rights organizations play their part in defending false blasphemy cases but their focus is limited and they cannot reach all accused and defend them. So, there is need to legislate on the issue as well apart from maintaining a governmental institution which can oversee that laws pertaining to blasphemy are not abused.”

Keeping in view the ten-point recommendations of Hameed-ur-Rehman Tribunal, like Action against the persons who have been held responsible for commissions and omissions, Establishment of intelligence & crime Prevention Branches, Framing of Rules, Constitution of District Religious Dispute Resolution Board, and the June 19, 2014 Supreme Court judgment, Federal Government must devise a plan to legislate on blasphemy laws taking on board the Ulema (religious scholars). Furthermore, an institution should also be established which can provide legal counsel to the accused in cases of false accusations. All blasphemy cases must be heard by at least a 3-member bench, with experts of international humanitarian law sitting there as observers. We need to improve and reinforce legislation to prevent bias creeping into judgments.

Data compiled by and report written by

 Muhammad Nafees, CRSS senior Research fellow

Abbas Ahmad, CRSS Research fellow