Current Projects

20th Chinese Communist Party Key Takeaways

On 16th October 2022, Chinese President Xi Jinping addressed the 20th Communist Party’s five-yearly congress meeting with a detailed speech outlining the ruling party’s accomplishments in recent years and its long-term plans. The party congress is the most significant political event in the country. It takes place once every five years, and its major objective is to choose the nation’s future leaders. China’s influence, appeal, and power to influence the world have all dramatically increased, according to the president, whose 10-year leadership has seen the country emerge as a global superpower. “Our future is bright, but we still have a long way to go,” Xi said to the more than 2,000 Chinese delegates attending the opening at Beijing’s Great Hall of the people. As anticipated, it appears likely that the Chinese president will fulfill his manifesto given his power, authority, and apparent popularity. Following below are the Key Takeaways covered in Mr. Xi’s speech: Zero-Covid Policy: China’s COVID control policies have resulted in travel restrictions, mass testing, quarantine, and strict lockdowns of entire cities in the region since the beginning of the pandemic. The number of covid related cases in China has been kept under control and President Xi has consistently backed the “dynamic zero COVID” policy, which has garnered international praise as well. President Xi stated that there would be no wavering on zero-Covid because of the need to prioritise saving people’s lives. “In launching an all-out people’s war to stop the spread of the virus, we have protected the people’s health and safety to the greatest extent possible and made tremendously encouraging achievements in both epidemic response and economic and social development,” he further added. Push for Economic Development: China’s economic growth had slowed down and resulted in weak domestic growth after taking a hit due to Covid lockdowns. President Xi emphasized that development is the party’s top...

ALL EYES ON THE 20th CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY CONGRESS MEETING

On 16th October, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will convene in an all-important gathering of senior committee members. This twice-a-decade event will make major decisions on China`s future path involving the reshuffling of powerful positions, and most importantly and likely, will re-elect President Xi for a further 5-year term, making him the most powerful leader of China since Chairman Mao Zedong.  President Xi, who holds the key posts of General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, President, Head of State, and Chairman of China`s Central Military Commission is often referred to as the Supreme Leader. He may remain in power for the rest of his life. Apart from President Xi’s re-election, the Central Committee will select 200 people from some 2,300 delegates to join the Central Committee and amongst them, 25 will be elected to the Party`s Politburo. These are the elite. Many observers believe that President Xi, in his third term, will be bringing back a more authoritarian rule of government. Already, some analysts are branding his style of socialism as the Xi Jinping thought, an assertively nationalist philosophy that is skeptical of private business. But China today is facing an economic challenge. Covid lockdowns, rising prices, a major property crisis, and a global recession triggered by the war in Ukraine, have damaged confidence. For President Xi, it is also a personal challenge. Economic growth under his rule has been the lowest than under previous presidents Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao. If economic performance doesn’t improve, it could bring serious political trouble for him. Another area of discussion will be China`s zero Covid approaches to the pandemic. While much of the world has been returning to normal, Chinese authorities are enforcing strict lockdowns and curfews` in around 70 cities. These steps are causing frustration and dissent amongst the population and are widely condemned. Some observers say that the party may use Congress to declare...

What Pakistan Wants from Afghanistan?

Peace in Afghanistan is crucial to peace in Pakistan and vice versa. With the Taliban’s return, Pakistan expected the de facto group to be a cooperative ally, but the situation says otherwise. The inefficacy and eventual failure of talks with TTP, the Afghan Taliban’s ill-treatment of girls and women, and general scorn from across the border make Pakistan critical of Afghanistan. Realistic expectations and cooperation are what the two countries need.  With the return of the Taliban in Afghanistan, Pakistan felt that it finally had a ‘friendly’ government across the border. Precisely, it celebrated the Taliban’s triumph – for some reasons, the foremost being India’s immediate departure from the scene, a country that had remained closer to the former Afghan government. India’s increased presence in Afghanistan in the past few years remained an irritant for Pakistan. The Indo-Afghan camaraderie became one of the root causes of dismay between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Hence, the region was devoid of sustainable peace. Since August 15, 2021, trade has remained the most potent viaduct between the two countries. But, overall, Pakistan’s trade with Afghanistan has declined by up to 30%. What stands out is that so far Pakistan has resolved most of the challenges related to trade and transit. At present, economic connectivity between the countries is at its smoothest. The recent coal deal has also helped Pakistan earn the neighboring country’s goodwill. Afghanistan also exported vegetables in bulk to Pakistan when the country lost major vegetation amidst the deadly floods. These are a few, but significant developments to cherish and highlight. But some pressing challenges still cause bad blood between the two neighbors. To bring an end to the TTP’s 14-year fight against Pakistan, Pakistani officials held negotiations with the terrorist organization, which were mediated by the Afghan Taliban. But when it became evident that the demands of a resolute TTP could not be...

Tech war: Shanghai wants to be an industrial hub of the future as US chip restrictions escalate

Under a new guideline, Shanghai aims to groom innovative enterprises and talent in health, smart tech, energy and other hi-tech industries The Chinese semiconductor capital has been struggling under draconian Covid-19 controls and growing US export restrictions hanghai, China’s financial and semiconductor production centre, has declared its ambition to become a base for “industries of the future” amid an intensifying US-China tech war and stringent Covid-19 controls. Under a guideline published by the Shanghai government on Tuesday, the city aims to groom innovative enterprises and talent in areas including health, smart technology, energy and materials. By 2030, the city wants to be home to 1,000 hi-tech enterprises with a combined production output of 500 billion yuan (US$70 billion). Shanghai, the country’s financial and business capital, has unexpectedly emerged as a high-end manufacturing base in recent years thanks to generous policy support. The city is currently China’s largest chip producer, contributing a quarter of the national semiconductor value output, as well as 40 per cent of chip talent last year. Several major Chinese chip companies, including national champion Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, are already headquartered in Shanghai, while start-ups such as Biren Technology and Iluvatar CoreX have also set up shop in the city. However, the city’s future has been clouded by the country’s draconian “dynamic zero” Covid-19 policy, as well as the US-China tech war. A fresh wave of coronavirus outbreaks since last week has prompted local officials to conduct mass testing and put thousands of people under quarantine, stoking bad memories of Shanghai’s citywide lockdown in April and May. After that large-scale lockdown, some of the city’s top talent considered leaving. Still, the government said in Tuesday’s plan that it wants to build five schools for future technologies and 15 innovation centres to woo high-level scientists and...

OPEC cuts oil production- India asserts its sovereign decision making in the market

The OPEC+ alliance of oil-exporting countries recently decided to drastically cut its oil production by two million barrels in order to “boost prices”. The decision may have a negative impact on consumers, businesses, and entire economies of several countries, including India, one of the major buyers. However, the Union Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas of India, Hardeep Singh Puri, stated that Indian government has a moral obligation to provide energy to its citizens and will therefore buy oil from wherever it wants to. “If you are clear about your policy, which means you believe in energy security and energy affordability, you will buy from wherever you have to purchase energy from sources,” he further added. On October 5, 2022, the OPEC+ alliance of oil-exporting countries had their first in-person meeting since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, at the oil cartel’s headquarters in Vienna. The coalition decided to drastically cut its oil production by two million barrels, effective by November, in order to “boost prices”. The decision, according to the group, was based on the “uncertainty that surrounds the global economic and oil market outlooks”. Since OPEC+ members already fall short of their quotas, the production cuts on oil prices and consequently, the price of gasoline derived from crude will be somewhat constrained. In lieu of the ongoing Ukraine crisis, the decision would also benefit alliance member Russia, whose gas supplies to Europe have been significantly reduced as a result of sanctions. However, this step by OPEC has angered the Biden administration as it is seen as a rebuff to the US, especially with mid-term US congressional elections coming up in November. The decision may also potentially have a negative impact on consumers, businesses, and entire economies of several countries, including India, one of the major buyers. Following the OPEC decision, the Union Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas of India, Hardeep Singh Puri, recently...

Western Propaganda on China!

In an interview with Matrix Media, Prof. Dr. Mohammad Ali Ehsan, an analyst on International Relations, had an in-depth discussion on matters relating to China, its model of governance, and its exploitation by the West. When asked on what difference has the Chinese communist party made to this western large province of Xin Jiang. He highlighted the ground reality today in China`s Xinjiang province and why the West has been relentlessly and unfoundedly hammering China on the Human Rights situation there, which is far from the truth. Xinjiang province, by its location, is at the extreme western end of China with a Muslim majority population. It is bordering eight Islamic countries such as Turkmenistan, Afghanistan etc. For China, the fear of extremist Islamic groups across the border, fanning hatred and starting an insurgency movement is genuine. It cannot afford to let its guard down. So far, China has succeeded in controlling the menace of extremism in Xinjiang, giving religious freedom to the Uighurs (Muslim majority in Xinjiang), by the existence of over 24,000 mosques in the province and undertaking massive infrastructure projects, including establishing a high-speed rail link with the rest of the country. However, to the west, especially the US, Xinjiang province is being used in a propaganda against China on human rights. Western media sources have been working overtime in wrongly depicting China for its so-called human rights abuses and exploitation of its people. The US has even gone to the extreme step of boycotting goods made in Xinjiang, fabricating stories of harsh treatment by the Chinese authorities on the Uighur community. But one has to go back in time to grasp historic realities as it was the West who colonized the world and used slavery to ship valuable commodities, stolen from the native people, back to their countries. It is also the West, that today remains silent on authoritarian regimes around the world, only because it serves their national...

A Price to Pay for Being Women

Women in Iran and Afghanistan are deprived of civil liberties because they are women. And, when these suppressed women take it to the streets, the governments use force, intimidate, or put them in jail, instead of addressing their demands. Women pay a high price for being women in the two theocracies.  Iran and Afghanistan have recently gained prominence in the international media for committing crimes they consider their moral values. The two countries tread on different paths religiously and ideologically, but they find no disagreement in pursuing one policy – keep their citizens, particularly women, subservient to the state’s diktat. There is no room for deviance – and those who dare to challenge it, have to pay a heavy price, such as how recently the moral brigade of Iran found a young Kurdish woman, Masha Amini, disobeying the dress code defined by the state. She was arrested immediately, and two days later, she died in police custody. Suspicions arose about the custodial torture by the police that resulted in the death of the young woman. However, police denied the charges and claimed that the cause of death was heart failure. What happened later was unimaginable for the authorities that were following state policy very religiously. The custodial death of the young woman, arrested on a morality issue, turned the country into a chaos that remains uncontrollable. An outcome that caught the whole Iranian government unaware. It all started on the day of the funeral ceremony at Saqez, the hometown of Masha Amini in Iran’s Kurdistan province. The mourners turned into protestors against the highhandedness of the police authority. The incident received front-page coverage by all Iranian newspapers, criticizing the imperiousness of the police force for enforcement of the dress code. Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi, a former judiciary chief with an ultra-conservative mindset, ordered an inquiry into the incident. As the wave of protests continued escalating, more and...

Women In Iran: Struggle for Suffrage and Freedom

Iran’s former queen, Farah Diba Pahlavi, once said: When Shah made me wear the crown, I felt like he was crowing all the Iranian women. Shah’s Iran was a secular but oppressive regime. However, it brought one affirmative change: suffrage for women. Since the Islamic revolution of 1979, women in Iran have lost considerable agency. Although Iran holds substantial clout among the Muslim countries, it is pushing its women back to the stone age. Recently, the Iranian morality police killed Mahsa Amini because her hijab was ‘improper’.  Iran started to make substantial strides toward gender equality and freedom in the 1920s. Education became free for both boys and girls. In addition, women could finally enroll at the country’s first university. The Iranian Women’s Party was founded in 1942. Fraternities as such pushed for changes in legislation for women despite opposition and challenges. Shah held a referendum on women’s suffrage, and it was approved. As a result of the historical event, Iranian women eventually gained the right to vote. Similarly, several other women-focused laws were passed during this decade, including the Family Protection Law, marriage, divorce, and child custody rights. Women made a sizeable portion of the labor force. By the late 1970s, hundreds of women had seats in municipal councils and parliament. Before the end of the Pahlavi rule in 1978, women made up 30% of students in the colleges. Shah Reza Pahlavi wanted modern, cosmopolitan cities without allowing for free political expression or upsetting landlords and tribal chiefs. The Shah and Western imperialism benefited from the Iranian monarchy – a political system devoid of democracy. The modernization effort pitted the Shah against the ulama, or Islamic religious authorities, and supported secularism. Iran was home to 80,000 mosques and its clerics possessed significant political and social influence. In the past, the clergy had rebelled against the Shah’s secular initiatives, including...

Alarming New Trend Manifests Serious Security Challenge for Pakistan

Killing of nine terrorists within four days in different parts of Pakistan represents a new challenge for Pakistan’s security forces. The Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD) in Karachi, capital of the southern Sindh province, took down two wanted militants in a major operation on Saturday, while security forces in the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province also killed seven militants in two different operations on Tuesday. Speaking about the encounter in Karachi’s outskirts, the CTD Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG) Asif Aijaz Shaikh claimed that the militants killed - Syed Aimal Khan alias Hamza (resident of Pishin) and Qari Abdullah alias Mamum (from Quetta) - were affiliated with the outlawed militant Islamic State Khorasan (IS-K) group and involved in major terrorism incidents in Balochistan. Interestingly, the same day, the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) had already owned up the two terrorists through a press release dated October 02. “They embraced shahadat after valiantly participating in various activities during the jihade Pakistan”, said the TTP spokesperson while praising the two. Open-source data, collected by the Center for Research and Security Studies (CRSS) underlines a scary new trend that has continued since early this year; within first nine months of 2022, mostly Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) related terrorists carried out as many as 274 attacks resulting in at least 455 deaths. This comes to almost an attack every day. Security forces also continued their push against terrorists and their affiliates with nearly 100 operations which left about 262 dead, mostly terrorists. In 2022, dozens of security personnel have also been killed in targeted attacks and operations, including as many as 82 policemen from KP province. In September alone, cumulatively, Pakistan army, para-military forces plus police suffered around 30 fatalities in various incidents and counter-terrorism missions. Beside the security forces, several tribal elders...

Focus on long-term Pak-US defence partnership: Lloyd Austin

US Defe­nce Secretary Lloyd J. Austin said on Wednesday that his talks with visiting Pakistan Army Chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa focused on the long-standing partnership between the two defence establishments and on areas of mutual interest. Underlining the importance of this partnership in a tweet he posted on his official site, Secretary Austin noted that this year marks the 75th anniversary of relations between the United States and Pakistan. In a separate statement, his office said that on Oct 4, Secretary Austin hosted Gen Bajwa at the Pentagon during the 75th anniversary of relations between the United States and Pakistan. “This long-standing partnership continues today with discussions focused on opportunities to address key mutual defence interests,” the Pentagon said. ISPR says Gen Bajwa, defence secretary discussed cooperation in various fields The military’s media department, ISPR, also highlighted this point in its statement, saying that the two leaders also discussed the “regional security situation and bilateral cooperation in various fields”. Additional points in the ISPR statement included the need for continued assistance from Pakistan’s global partner for the rehabilitation of flood victims in Pakistan and enhancing trade and economic ties between the two allies. “Both sides had convergence on major international issues, including Afghan­istan,” and also on the “need for cooperation to avoid humanitarian crisis and improving peace and stability in the region”. Diplomatic sources in Washington, however, say that the talks with US officials focused on renewing the strong defence partnership that once existed between the two allies. Diplomatic observers view this effort against the backdrop of a recent announcement by the US State Depar­tment that it has asked Cong­ress to release $450 million for the sustenance of Pakis­tan’s fleet of F-16 aircraft. After the announcement, the US rejected India’s criticism that those planes would be used against New...

TOP STORIES

TESTIMONIALS

“

I am also a member of National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Information and Broadcasting. Recently, we held a meeting with the Director General of Radio Pakistan and we told them to initiate such local programs (like Constituency Hour) in regional languages to educate and inform people. Even Indian Radio can be heard in FATA which is being used for propaganda purposes and must be closed. Therefore, we should launch some standard and quality programs like CRSS that will change the taste of the listeners.

Soniya Shams

Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Peshawar