Current Projects

OPEC cuts oil production- India asserts its sovereign decision making in the market

The OPEC+ alliance of oil-exporting countries recently decided to drastically cut its oil production by two million barrels in order to “boost prices”. The decision may have a negative impact on consumers, businesses, and entire economies of several countries, including India, one of the major buyers. However, the Union Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas of India, Hardeep Singh Puri, stated that Indian government has a moral obligation to provide energy to its citizens and will therefore buy oil from wherever it wants to. “If you are clear about your policy, which means you believe in energy security and energy affordability, you will buy from wherever you have to purchase energy from sources,” he further added. On October 5, 2022, the OPEC+ alliance of oil-exporting countries had their first in-person meeting since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, at the oil cartel’s headquarters in Vienna. The coalition decided to drastically cut its oil production by two million barrels, effective by November, in order to “boost prices”. The decision, according to the group, was based on the “uncertainty that surrounds the global economic and oil market outlooks”. Since OPEC+ members already fall short of their quotas, the production cuts on oil prices and consequently, the price of gasoline derived from crude will be somewhat constrained. In lieu of the ongoing Ukraine crisis, the decision would also benefit alliance member Russia, whose gas supplies to Europe have been significantly reduced as a result of sanctions. However, this step by OPEC has angered the Biden administration as it is seen as a rebuff to the US, especially with mid-term US congressional elections coming up in November. The decision may also potentially have a negative impact on consumers, businesses, and entire economies of several countries, including India, one of the major buyers. Following the OPEC decision, the Union Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas of India, Hardeep Singh Puri, recently...

Western Propaganda on China!

In an interview with Matrix Media, Prof. Dr. Mohammad Ali Ehsan, an analyst on International Relations, had an in-depth discussion on matters relating to China, its model of governance, and its exploitation by the West. When asked on what difference has the Chinese communist party made to this western large province of Xin Jiang. He highlighted the ground reality today in China`s Xinjiang province and why the West has been relentlessly and unfoundedly hammering China on the Human Rights situation there, which is far from the truth. Xinjiang province, by its location, is at the extreme western end of China with a Muslim majority population. It is bordering eight Islamic countries such as Turkmenistan, Afghanistan etc. For China, the fear of extremist Islamic groups across the border, fanning hatred and starting an insurgency movement is genuine. It cannot afford to let its guard down. So far, China has succeeded in controlling the menace of extremism in Xinjiang, giving religious freedom to the Uighurs (Muslim majority in Xinjiang), by the existence of over 24,000 mosques in the province and undertaking massive infrastructure projects, including establishing a high-speed rail link with the rest of the country. However, to the west, especially the US, Xinjiang province is being used in a propaganda against China on human rights. Western media sources have been working overtime in wrongly depicting China for its so-called human rights abuses and exploitation of its people. The US has even gone to the extreme step of boycotting goods made in Xinjiang, fabricating stories of harsh treatment by the Chinese authorities on the Uighur community. But one has to go back in time to grasp historic realities as it was the West who colonized the world and used slavery to ship valuable commodities, stolen from the native people, back to their countries. It is also the West, that today remains silent on authoritarian regimes around the world, only because it serves their national...

A Price to Pay for Being Women

Women in Iran and Afghanistan are deprived of civil liberties because they are women. And, when these suppressed women take it to the streets, the governments use force, intimidate, or put them in jail, instead of addressing their demands. Women pay a high price for being women in the two theocracies.  Iran and Afghanistan have recently gained prominence in the international media for committing crimes they consider their moral values. The two countries tread on different paths religiously and ideologically, but they find no disagreement in pursuing one policy – keep their citizens, particularly women, subservient to the state’s diktat. There is no room for deviance – and those who dare to challenge it, have to pay a heavy price, such as how recently the moral brigade of Iran found a young Kurdish woman, Masha Amini, disobeying the dress code defined by the state. She was arrested immediately, and two days later, she died in police custody. Suspicions arose about the custodial torture by the police that resulted in the death of the young woman. However, police denied the charges and claimed that the cause of death was heart failure. What happened later was unimaginable for the authorities that were following state policy very religiously. The custodial death of the young woman, arrested on a morality issue, turned the country into a chaos that remains uncontrollable. An outcome that caught the whole Iranian government unaware. It all started on the day of the funeral ceremony at Saqez, the hometown of Masha Amini in Iran’s Kurdistan province. The mourners turned into protestors against the highhandedness of the police authority. The incident received front-page coverage by all Iranian newspapers, criticizing the imperiousness of the police force for enforcement of the dress code. Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi, a former judiciary chief with an ultra-conservative mindset, ordered an inquiry into the incident. As the wave of protests continued escalating, more and...

Women In Iran: Struggle for Suffrage and Freedom

Iran’s former queen, Farah Diba Pahlavi, once said: When Shah made me wear the crown, I felt like he was crowing all the Iranian women. Shah’s Iran was a secular but oppressive regime. However, it brought one affirmative change: suffrage for women. Since the Islamic revolution of 1979, women in Iran have lost considerable agency. Although Iran holds substantial clout among the Muslim countries, it is pushing its women back to the stone age. Recently, the Iranian morality police killed Mahsa Amini because her hijab was ‘improper’.  Iran started to make substantial strides toward gender equality and freedom in the 1920s. Education became free for both boys and girls. In addition, women could finally enroll at the country’s first university. The Iranian Women’s Party was founded in 1942. Fraternities as such pushed for changes in legislation for women despite opposition and challenges. Shah held a referendum on women’s suffrage, and it was approved. As a result of the historical event, Iranian women eventually gained the right to vote. Similarly, several other women-focused laws were passed during this decade, including the Family Protection Law, marriage, divorce, and child custody rights. Women made a sizeable portion of the labor force. By the late 1970s, hundreds of women had seats in municipal councils and parliament. Before the end of the Pahlavi rule in 1978, women made up 30% of students in the colleges. Shah Reza Pahlavi wanted modern, cosmopolitan cities without allowing for free political expression or upsetting landlords and tribal chiefs. The Shah and Western imperialism benefited from the Iranian monarchy – a political system devoid of democracy. The modernization effort pitted the Shah against the ulama, or Islamic religious authorities, and supported secularism. Iran was home to 80,000 mosques and its clerics possessed significant political and social influence. In the past, the clergy had rebelled against the Shah’s secular initiatives, including...

Alarming New Trend Manifests Serious Security Challenge for Pakistan

Killing of nine terrorists within four days in different parts of Pakistan represents a new challenge for Pakistan’s security forces. The Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD) in Karachi, capital of the southern Sindh province, took down two wanted militants in a major operation on Saturday, while security forces in the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province also killed seven militants in two different operations on Tuesday. Speaking about the encounter in Karachi’s outskirts, the CTD Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG) Asif Aijaz Shaikh claimed that the militants killed - Syed Aimal Khan alias Hamza (resident of Pishin) and Qari Abdullah alias Mamum (from Quetta) - were affiliated with the outlawed militant Islamic State Khorasan (IS-K) group and involved in major terrorism incidents in Balochistan. Interestingly, the same day, the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) had already owned up the two terrorists through a press release dated October 02. “They embraced shahadat after valiantly participating in various activities during the jihade Pakistan”, said the TTP spokesperson while praising the two. Open-source data, collected by the Center for Research and Security Studies (CRSS) underlines a scary new trend that has continued since early this year; within first nine months of 2022, mostly Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) related terrorists carried out as many as 274 attacks resulting in at least 455 deaths. This comes to almost an attack every day. Security forces also continued their push against terrorists and their affiliates with nearly 100 operations which left about 262 dead, mostly terrorists. In 2022, dozens of security personnel have also been killed in targeted attacks and operations, including as many as 82 policemen from KP province. In September alone, cumulatively, Pakistan army, para-military forces plus police suffered around 30 fatalities in various incidents and counter-terrorism missions. Beside the security forces, several tribal elders...

Focus on long-term Pak-US defence partnership: Lloyd Austin

US Defe­nce Secretary Lloyd J. Austin said on Wednesday that his talks with visiting Pakistan Army Chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa focused on the long-standing partnership between the two defence establishments and on areas of mutual interest. Underlining the importance of this partnership in a tweet he posted on his official site, Secretary Austin noted that this year marks the 75th anniversary of relations between the United States and Pakistan. In a separate statement, his office said that on Oct 4, Secretary Austin hosted Gen Bajwa at the Pentagon during the 75th anniversary of relations between the United States and Pakistan. “This long-standing partnership continues today with discussions focused on opportunities to address key mutual defence interests,” the Pentagon said. ISPR says Gen Bajwa, defence secretary discussed cooperation in various fields The military’s media department, ISPR, also highlighted this point in its statement, saying that the two leaders also discussed the “regional security situation and bilateral cooperation in various fields”. Additional points in the ISPR statement included the need for continued assistance from Pakistan’s global partner for the rehabilitation of flood victims in Pakistan and enhancing trade and economic ties between the two allies. “Both sides had convergence on major international issues, including Afghan­istan,” and also on the “need for cooperation to avoid humanitarian crisis and improving peace and stability in the region”. Diplomatic sources in Washington, however, say that the talks with US officials focused on renewing the strong defence partnership that once existed between the two allies. Diplomatic observers view this effort against the backdrop of a recent announcement by the US State Depar­tment that it has asked Cong­ress to release $450 million for the sustenance of Pakis­tan’s fleet of F-16 aircraft. After the announcement, the US rejected India’s criticism that those planes would be used against New...

UAE Seeks Closer Green Partnership With China and Promotes Renewables

As the United Arab Emirates' energy transition gathers pace before it hosts the United Nations climate conference next year, it is looking to climate partners such as China to help it sustain the momentum, its climate change special envoy says. Sultan Al Jaber, the UAE special envoy for climate change and minister of industry and advanced technology, said the UAE is seeing "record growth in renewables", representing more than 80 percent of all new power-generating capacity last year. However, he said, a transformative and pragmatic global energy transition is needed to deliver climate action, and while wind and solar accounted for the vast majority of all new power-generating capacity last year, this still only accounts for 4 percent of today's energy mix. "As the world's energy needs grow ever larger, maintaining global energy security will require oil and gas to remain a significant part of the mix for decades to come," Al Jaber said. A successful energy transition must make progress with economic and climate action in tandem, he said. As part of this, "we know we must do more now" to reduce the impact of oil and gas on the climate, and in the medium term the UAE plans to increase its renewables portfolio to 100 gigawatts by 2030. "I see many more opportunities for collaboration with China as we continue to build and adapt to clean energy solutions. We are constantly looking to the future and have allocated more than $1.5 billion in grants and low-interest loans for renewable energy innovation in more than 40 countries." Like China, Al Jaber said, the UAE is also investing in clean energy projects globally, with more than $50 billion across six continents, including in 27 climate-vulnerable island nations, which, he said, "is extremely important to us" and is one of the country's key approaches for COP 28 UAE next year. In 2017, the UAE launched Energy Strategy 2050, which is considered the first unified energy strategy in the country that is based on supply and...

US Cannot Walk Away From Pakistan: Report

WASHINGTON: The United States and Pakistan need to rebuild a modest but pragmatic relationship, based on mutual respect for each other’s interests, and not on exaggerated expectations, says a report released on Tuesday. The report, prepared by a dozen American scholars of South Asian affairs associated with the Pakistan Study Group (PSG), Washington, has been released a day before Pakistan’s Army Chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa is expected to meet US scholars and think-tank experts at the Pakistan Embassy. The paper warns American policy makers that they cannot afford to walk away from a country that involves three key regions — South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East — and has borders with China and Iran and is close to Russia. The authors include a former US secretary of state for South Asia, two former US ambassadors to Pakistan, a former Pakistani ambassador to the US and other senior diplomats who have worked in Pakistan, and American scholars specialising in South Asia. According to this paper, a modest, pragmatic relationship between the US and Pakistan would involve understanding that Pakistan and the US will “continue to see Afghanistan through different lens but can cooperate in maintaining peace in that country and alleviating its people’s suffering”. It also reminds American policymakers that “attitudes toward India at both the elite and popular levels in Pakistan will, at best, change slowly”. The report also notes that “public opinion in both the US and Pakistan acts as constraints on bilateral relations”. The United States, however, can still induce Pakistan to change its overall strategic calculus, which is based on Pakistan’s understanding of its security environment, it added. The paper acknowledges that the United States and Pakistan have divergent views on China and recommends “a more nuanced US policy on Pakistan”. The authors argue that the US engagement with Pakistan would benefit if it were based on a realistic appraisal of Pakistan’s...

Unga Session: Pakistan-India Exchange Barbs on Human Rights And Minorities

At the 77th session of the United Nations General Assembly summit, the Prime Minister  of Pakistan, Shahbaz Sharif, brought world’s attention to the gross violation of human rights in Indian-held Kashmir and the degrading of Muslim and other minorities, by the hardline BJP government of Narendra Modi. India, on the other hand, has viciously attacked and accused Pakistan of sponsoring anti-state activities and harboring terrorists. On 23rd September 2022, at the 77th session of the United Nations General Assembly summit of world leaders in New York, Pakistani Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif addressed the forum and highlighted the challenges that his country faces today. After detailing the vast destruction caused by the recent floods, he also voiced concerns on how Afghanistan and India are impacting Pakistan. Since the formation of a new interim government in Afghanistan in August 2021, Pakistan has been a steadfast supporter of its neighbor. It has taken in thousands of fleeing Afghan refugees and provided urgent humanitarian aid. Despite its best attempts to support the Afghan regime and the people, Pakistan is still facing almost daily terrorist attacks originating in Afghanistan. Expressing his frustration, Sharif blamed the Afghan regime for not taking concrete steps to stop terrorist incursions in to Pakistan. The Prime Minister named ISIS-K, TTP (Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan), Al Qaeda, and JeM (Jaish-e-Mohammad), as the main groups carrying out these attacks. He further stated that one of Pakistan`s most wanted terrorists, Maulana Masood Azhar of JeM, is based in their country and asked the authorities to arrest and hand him over to Pakistan. These remarks upset the Afghans who vehemently denied the allegations, saying they were unsubstantiated. Considering, in a previous statement, the Taliban claimed that they will arrest and try for ‘”treason” anyone using Afghanistan’s soil against Pakistan or other countries, as skepticism grows over the Islamist group’s...

Ukraine war: in Russia’s nuclear brinkmanship, weapons leave room for warning

As Vladimir Putin’s game of chicken with the US and its allies over Ukraine escalates into a new round of nuclear threats, the smaller weapons that his officials have called on him to use may provide vital hours or even days of warning. While Russia’s long-range missiles and bombers are kept on constant alert, ready to fire in just minutes to ensure they aren’t destroyed by a pre-emptive strike, lower-yielding tactical weapons are locked up in about a dozen warehouses across Russia and it would take time to transport them to launchers. “At a certain level of readiness, weapons are taken out of storage facilities and moved to some other place, for days if necessary. This would be detected by satellites or other means,” said Pavel Podvig, a nuclear security expert at the UN Institute for Disarmament Research in Geneva. That would be exactly the point. So far, US and European officials have said there’s no sign of any such preparations and the nuclear threats have remained purely rhetorical. But as Russian forces steadily lose ground to a Ukrainian counteroffensive – including territory the Russian president formally claimed as his own last week – the Kremlin has again sought to sow fear with hints that further escalation may involve arms that haven’t been used in war since 1945. The threats are part of a broad attempt by the Kremlin to intimidate the US and Europe into cutting support for Ukraine and forcing Kyiv into negotiations on Moscow’s terms. With Europeans braced for a difficult winter after Russia triggered an unprecedented energy crisis by cutting gas supplies, Putin’s seeking to widen divisions within Europe over the price of continued support for Ukraine to try to turn public opinion in key states as tensions grow. His decision to call up 300,000 reservists to shore up Russia’s struggling army and the hasty annexation of the occupied territories, followed by a fiery speech that accused the West of “Satanism”, were just the latest attempts to show the...

TOP STORIES

TESTIMONIALS

I am also a member of National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Information and Broadcasting. Recently, we held a meeting with the Director General of Radio Pakistan and we told them to initiate such local programs (like Constituency Hour) in regional languages to educate and inform people. Even Indian Radio can be heard in FATA which is being used for propaganda purposes and must be closed. Therefore, we should launch some standard and quality programs like CRSS that will change the taste of the listeners.

Soniya Shams

Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Peshawar