Current Projects
Don’t miss exclusive PTV show ‘Hum Bhi Pakistan’ on FATA Reforms on Sunday, December 28 at 6 P.M
Topic: FATA Reforms; way forward Guests: Aftab Ahmad Khan Sherpao (Former Federal Minister and Head Qaumi Watan Party) Farhat ullah Babar (Senator, Pakistan People’s Party Parliamentarians) Ghalib Khan (MNA- NA 41) Muhammad Jamal-ud-din (MNA- NA 42) Shah Ji Gul Afridi (MNA-NA 45) Theme: The program provides an insight into the sufferings of FATA, it discusses with participants the solutions; what could be done? Who is responsible for those sufferings? And how effectively can be the fundamental rights and laws of the state be implemented in FATA? Watch ‘Hum Bhi Pakistan’ for understanding how status quo can be eliminated in FATA and bring about the reforms necessary for the induction of FATA into national mainstream. Watch Promo http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2cl1su_final-episode-hum-bhi-pakistan_news
Orders of Magnitude and the Human Cost of Illicit Financial Flows
By Any Measure, Illicit Financial Flows Pose a Devastating Challenge to Developing Countries and Human Lives Thomas Pogge—Professor of Philosophy and International Affairs at Yale University, Director of the Global Justice Program, President of Academics Stand Against Poverty (ASAP), and member of the Board of Directors of Global Financial Integrity (GFI)—has estimated that 18 million people die each year of economic deprivation and causes stemming therefrom. His calculation is based in good part upon estimating the number of people dying from preventable diseases. GFI estimates that US$1 trillion a year of illicit financial flows drains from developing countries into western accounts. Our estimate is based on balance of payments and balance of trade data filed by governments with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the same data that is used by millions of people every day in making decisions about investments, loans, interest rates, exchange rates, and more. We believe that our data is very conservative because it does not include major components of illicit outflows, which do not show up in official statistics. 18 million people dying a year is around 50,000 people a day. US$1 trillion a year is roughly US$3 billion a day. On this day, how many of the 50,000 people will live, if the US$3 billion stays home? This is the most fundamental way of thinking about the human and economic relationships with which we are dealing. And note—this is the key point—that the importance of dealing with this relationship does not change if: the number of people dying is halved and the money escaping is halved (25,000 deaths per day with a daily illicit outflow of US$1.5 billion); or in each case the figures are doubled (100,000 deaths per day with a daily illicit outflow of US$6 billion); or one is halved and the other is doubled (the numbers are still huge). What is important here is the order of magnitude. Any way you cut it, we are dealing with an enormous drainage of...
Pakistan: The real war is the war of narrative
The closer you want to get to eradicating the menace of terrorism, the bigger this menace seems to get. For the past week, following the attack in Peshawar, our leaders, both in Khaki and Mufti, have deliberated and deliberated. But this piece is not about them and the solutions they might come up with. It is about the sociology of the mindset that either justifies or rationalises terrorism, or impedes tangible action against it. It is about the failure of the state and the society to come up with a narrative that can defeat the terrorists. Terrorists of all hues — Al Qaeda, Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan and its countless affiliates, Afghan Taliban and its affiliates like the Haqqani network, India-focused terror groups like Lashkar-e-Tayyaba and sectarian terror groups like Lashkar-e-Jhangvi — use two weapons: incredible hatred towards their victims and a narrative to convince and recruit new supporters to the cause. This narrative of victimhood, denial and conspiracy theories can easily be deconstructed and dismantled. But what with the rising anger in the country, fracturing of the society and the general iffiness of the times we live in, no one has done anything substantial about the issue despite harping on about it at great length. After 9/11, the United States knew whom to blame and the nation’s anger was projected outwards. After 7/7, the United Kingdom knew whom to blame, and the country was able to vent its anger. After Mumbai attack, India too, vented its anger on Pakistan and somehow managed to cool off. In Pakistan, though, where the state had pandered to extremist inclinations for long, at the time of 9/11 there was a dictator in place, whose rise to fame and then power owed a lot to the Kargil debacle. When General Musharraf decided to take a U-turn in his Afghan/Taliban policy, he gave his people the wrong reasons for doing so. Instead of telling them that extremism of all kinds is bad for the country; that it can easily turn against the country's own...
Pakistan’s “Jet Set Go” Response – Military Courts
The National Plan of Action (NPA) to combat terrorism, has seen unprecedented political and military reconciliation, despite significant reservations by several key players. The Prime Minister and Chief of Army Staff hope this transforms into practical action and tangible results. Political Reconciliation Extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures, seems to be the go to line for the government and the military to justify and placate opposition to the various tenants of the 20-point National Plan of Action (NPA) to combat terrorism, as announced by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. The late-night televised speech was a landmark moment in Pakistani history, relaying to the public a "comprehensive strategy" to root out the menace of terrorism permanently. The political response to the NPA has been at every point along the reconciliation spectrum. Mushahid Hussain of the Pakistan Muslim League - Quaid (PML-Q) fully supported the plan, stating, “We have unprecedented circumstances now which call for unprecedented measures.” This was in direct contract to Senator Aitzaz Ahsan of the Pakistan People's Party (PPP), who opposed the formation of such courts, saying these they had no place in a democratic setup. The Awami National Party (ANP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) also opposed the formation of the military courts. Former Interior Minister also played a crucial role in the eventual reconciliation, calling former President Asif Ali Zardari to bring him on board. The central leadership also called MQM chief Altaf Hussain to ally the party's fears of their workers getting caught in the net. The Prime Minister personally addressed leaders of the ANP to get their support. 0Other prominent politicians, such as Leader of the Opposition Syed Khurshid Shah, Hasil Bazenjo, and Aftab Sherpao also supported the decision. Imran Khan of Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaaf, eventually came on board, but also asked that armed groups be banned across the country, a...
Pakistan's "Jet Set Go" Response – Military Courts
The National Plan of Action (NPA) to combat terrorism, has seen unprecedented political and military reconciliation, despite significant reservations by several key players. The Prime Minister and Chief of Army Staff hope this transforms into practical action and tangible results. Political Reconciliation Extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures, seems to be the go to line for the government and the military to justify and placate opposition to the various tenants of the 20-point National Plan of Action (NPA) to combat terrorism, as announced by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. The late-night televised speech was a landmark moment in Pakistani history, relaying to the public a "comprehensive strategy" to root out the menace of terrorism permanently. The political response to the NPA has been at every point along the reconciliation spectrum. Mushahid Hussain of the Pakistan Muslim League - Quaid (PML-Q) fully supported the plan, stating, “We have unprecedented circumstances now which call for unprecedented measures.” This was in direct contract to Senator Aitzaz Ahsan of the Pakistan People's Party (PPP), who opposed the formation of such courts, saying these they had no place in a democratic setup. The Awami National Party (ANP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) also opposed the formation of the military courts. Former Interior Minister also played a crucial role in the eventual reconciliation, calling former President Asif Ali Zardari to bring him on board. The central leadership also called MQM chief Altaf Hussain to ally the party's fears of their workers getting caught in the net. The Prime Minister personally addressed leaders of the ANP to get their support. 0Other prominent politicians, such as Leader of the Opposition Syed Khurshid Shah, Hasil Bazenjo, and Aftab Sherpao also supported the decision. Imran Khan of Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaaf, eventually came on board, but also asked that armed groups be banned across the country, a...
Pakistan's "Jet Set Go" Response – Military Courts
The National Plan of Action (NPA) to combat terrorism, has seen unprecedented political and military reconciliation, despite significant reservations by several key players. The Prime Minister and Chief of Army Staff hope this transforms into practical action and tangible results. Political Reconciliation Extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures, seems to be the go to line for the government and the military to justify and placate opposition to the various tenants of the 20-point National Plan of Action (NPA) to combat terrorism, as announced by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. The late-night televised speech was a landmark moment in Pakistani history, relaying to the public a "comprehensive strategy" to root out the menace of terrorism permanently. The political response to the NPA has been at every point along the reconciliation spectrum. Mushahid Hussain of the Pakistan Muslim League - Quaid (PML-Q) fully supported the plan, stating, “We have unprecedented circumstances now which call for unprecedented measures.” This was in direct contract to Senator Aitzaz Ahsan of the Pakistan People's Party (PPP), who opposed the formation of such courts, saying these they had no place in a democratic setup. The Awami National Party (ANP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) also opposed the formation of the military courts. Former Interior Minister also played a crucial role in the eventual reconciliation, calling former President Asif Ali Zardari to bring him on board. The central leadership also called MQM chief Altaf Hussain to ally the party's fears of their workers getting caught in the net. The Prime Minister personally addressed leaders of the ANP to get their support. 0Other prominent politicians, such as Leader of the Opposition Syed Khurshid Shah, Hasil Bazenjo, and Aftab Sherpao also supported the decision. Imran Khan of Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaaf, eventually came on board, but also asked that armed groups be banned across the country, a...
A shake-up call
Has the December 16 Peshawar carnage finally induced a triangular fight against Al-Qaeda-linked or inspired groups? A string of meetings between the Pakistani, Afghan and American security officials, it seems, has reduced mistrust, bolstered multi-lateral confidence and possibly provided the much-needed fillip for an offensive against terrorists who are piling misery on forces not only both in Pakistan and Afghanistan but who also threaten the peace of the extended region. The Afghan security forces’ latest action in the Kunar province, the region Mulla Fazlullah and his deadly men are reportedly using as their sanctuaries, is probably the latest indicator for this trilateral anti-terror operation. This reborn optimism stems from General Raheel Sharif’s air-dashes to Kabul on December 17 during which he reportedly tabled hard evidence on the handlers in Afghanistan of the Peshawar attackers. Diplomatic officials say President Ashraf Ghani gave a categorical commitment that he wont allow his soil to be used against Pakistan. Similarly, American officials insist Mulla Fazlullah remains on top of their hit-list because of the threats he poses to Pakistan and others. Being witness to the latest Pak-Afghan security officials’ dialogue, the American sound upbeat and optimistic about the future of security cooperation with Pakistan. President Ashraf Ghani gave a categorical commitment that he wont allow his soil to be used against Pakistan This all portends well and is extremely welcome if true, but will this offensive deliver lasting answers to Pakistan’s internal security turmoil? Is it the only option that Islamabad is desperately pursuing to deal with the lingering security crisis and the socalled looming blow-back? Certainly not. Let us see why cooperation from Afghanistan may just be a small part of the options that Pakistan must exercise to neutralize the TTP and Al-Qaeda threats. Firstly, Pakistan’s security crisis is rooted in its own skewed foreign and internal...
Response to terrorism: Pakistan’s defining moment?
Following a ten-hour marathon meeting of the civilian and military leadership on Wednesday, Dec 24, 2014, Pakistan's Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif told the nation in a midnight televised address that the battle lines were drawn between terrorists and those opposed to it. He termed it a "defining moment" for the country in the fight against terrorism. “A line has been drawn. On one side are coward terrorists and on the side stands the whole nation,” Sharif said, while unveiling the 20-point National Action Plan (NAP) that envisages establishment of special courts for speedy trial of terror suspects and a crackdown on al-Qaeda-linked jihadi and sectarian outfits. “The Peshawar atrocity has changed Pakistan. We need to eradicate the mindset of terrorism to defeat extremism and sectarianism,” he said. “This horrendous attack has shaken the nation as the terrorists attacked the future of this country.” The meeting had been convened to the context of the December 16 Peshawar Army Public School attack by radical TTP militants, which left 141 students and teachers dead. The incident, called by many as Pakistan's 9/11, triggered a massive response by the political leadership and the entire military establishment culminating in the NAP. The tragic event at Peshawar also forced Imran Khan, the head of the rival political party Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), to end his 126-day sit-in protest against Sharif's ruling party the Pakistan Muslim League-N (PML-N). PTI and other parties reluctantly agreed to the establishment of special military-led courts for a limited period of two years, underlining the need for a sustained, comprehensive long-term counter-terrorism strategy. They also consented to a drive to formally register some 20,000 religious seminaries being run by various religious groups and rightwing political parties. In his address Prime Minister Sharif reiterated that the execution of convicted terrorists will continue. A day after the Peshawar tragedy, which...
Response to terrorism: Pakistan's defining moment?
Following a ten-hour marathon meeting of the civilian and military leadership on Wednesday, Dec 24, 2014, Pakistan's Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif told the nation in a midnight televised address that the battle lines were drawn between terrorists and those opposed to it. He termed it a "defining moment" for the country in the fight against terrorism. “A line has been drawn. On one side are coward terrorists and on the side stands the whole nation,” Sharif said, while unveiling the 20-point National Action Plan (NAP) that envisages establishment of special courts for speedy trial of terror suspects and a crackdown on al-Qaeda-linked jihadi and sectarian outfits. “The Peshawar atrocity has changed Pakistan. We need to eradicate the mindset of terrorism to defeat extremism and sectarianism,” he said. “This horrendous attack has shaken the nation as the terrorists attacked the future of this country.” The meeting had been convened to the context of the December 16 Peshawar Army Public School attack by radical TTP militants, which left 141 students and teachers dead. The incident, called by many as Pakistan's 9/11, triggered a massive response by the political leadership and the entire military establishment culminating in the NAP. The tragic event at Peshawar also forced Imran Khan, the head of the rival political party Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), to end his 126-day sit-in protest against Sharif's ruling party the Pakistan Muslim League-N (PML-N). PTI and other parties reluctantly agreed to the establishment of special military-led courts for a limited period of two years, underlining the need for a sustained, comprehensive long-term counter-terrorism strategy. They also consented to a drive to formally register some 20,000 religious seminaries being run by various religious groups and rightwing political parties. In his address Prime Minister Sharif reiterated that the execution of convicted terrorists will continue. A day after the Peshawar tragedy, which...
Pursuit of Justice and Rule of Law
Executed man cleared of rape and murder A court in northern China cleared a man on Monday of the rape and murder of a woman in a public toilet 18 years after he was executed for the crimes. Inner Mongolia High People's Court overturned the conviction of Hugjiltu, who was 18 when he was sentenced to death and executed for the crimes. Zhao Jianping, vice-president of the court, arrived at Hugjiltu's home with a retrial judgment at 8:30 am on Monday, apologizing for the mistake and announcing that the executed man was innocent. Giving 30,000 yuan ($4,500) to the family, Zhao promised them that further compensation will be provided. Shang Aiyun, Hugjiltu's mother, wept and hugged her husband, saying the judgment is the culmination of her efforts to appeal over the past decade. Miao Li, a lawyer representing the family, said an application will be made for state compensation as soon as possible, but added that an exact figure cannot be confirmed at present. Hugjiltu, a member of the Mongolian ethnic group, was convicted of raping and fatally choking a woman in a toilet at a textile factory in Hohhot, capital of the Inner Mongolia autonomous region, on April 9, 1996. He was executed 61 days later. But the case triggered controversy when Zhao Zhihong confessed to the murder after he was arrested in 2005. The high people's court decided to retry the case on Nov 20. Court spokesman Li Shengchen said at a news conference on Monday that there were unclear facts and insufficient evidence in the initial verdict that convicted Hugjiltu of homicide. But whether Zhao committed the murder will depend on investigations into his case, Li said. He added that the local government has set up a group to find out where the mistake was made and where to apportion blame. "Problematical judicial officers must be called to account, and we'll disclose related information quickly," he said. The local public security authority confirmed that an investigation is underway and said it will target...
TOP STORIES
TESTIMONIALS
“
I am also a member of National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Information and Broadcasting. Recently, we held a meeting with the Director General of Radio Pakistan and we told them to initiate such local programs (like Constituency Hour) in regional languages to educate and inform people. Even Indian Radio can be heard in FATA which is being used for propaganda purposes and must be closed. Therefore, we should launch some standard and quality programs like CRSS that will change the taste of the listeners.