Current Projects

US Set to Sell Pakistan Arms Worth $1b

The United States is all set to sell Pakistan weapons worth about one billion dollars. The Obama Administration, as per the US law, has notified the U.S. Congress about the sale, which includes sophisticated weapons and attack helicopters. “The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to Pakistan for AH-1Z Viper Attack Helicopters and AGM-114R Hellfire II Missiles and associated equipment, parts, training and logistical support for an estimated cost of $952 million. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency delivered the required certification notifying Congress of this possible sale,” said the Defense Security Cooperation Agency. The weapons will enhance Pakistani military’s capabilities in fighting the Taliban extremists in the country’s restive northwest, especially in the semiautonomous FATA tribal regions bordering Afghanistan. “We have a very close counterterrorism relationship with Pakistan for a very – for very good reasons.  There’s still a serious threat in Pakistan from terrorists who have either attacked the United States or American soldiers in Afghanistan, who have tried to plot and plan against the West, including the U.S.  Obviously, the remnants of core al-Qaida are in the – mainly in the tribal areas of Pakistan.  So the Pakistanis have a serious problem still, and that’s why we’re trying to help them.  This is in our national security interest to do so,” said State Department acting spokesperson Marie Harf during her daily press briefing in Washington DC. According to DSCA, Pakistan has requested possible sale of 15 AH-1Z Viper Attack Helicopters, 32 T-700 GE 401C Engines (30 installed and 2 spares), 1000 AGM-114 R Hellfire II Missiles in containers, 36 H-1 Technical Refresh Mission computers, 17 AN/AAQ-30 Target Sight Systems, 30 629F-23 Ultra High Frequency/Very High Frequency Communication Systems, 19 H-764 Embedded Global Positioning System/Inertial Navigation Systems, 32 Helmet Mounted...

8 bottled water brands found to be ‘unsafe for consumption’

A government laboratory has declared that eight brands of mineral and bottled water – currently available on the open market – are “completely unsafe” for human consumption due to “chemical and microbiological contaminations”. “[A] comparison of analytical findings with the permissible limits set by the Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA) has revealed that eight brands are unsafe due to chemical or microbiological contamination,” says the quarterly report of the Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources (PCRWR) for January-March 2015. According to PCRWR – which is a part of the Ministry of Science and Techonology – bottled water brands that were found to be unsafe for consumption include the brands Al-Haider, Noble, Drop Ice, Al-Sana, Days Pure, Effort, Aqua Safe and Butt. The PCRWR had collected samples of 71 commercially available bottled water brands from local markets in seven cities of the country, including Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Lahore, Sialkot, Karachi, Tando Jam and Quetta. The report says that three of the unsafe brands – Al-Sana, Aqua Safe and Days Pure – have comparatively high arsenic levels, ranging from 11-35 parts per billion (ppb) as opposed to the Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority’s definition, should be less than 10 ppb. Unsafe brands had high levels of sodium, potassium, arsenic and biological contaminants Excessive arsenic in the water can cause various disorders of the skin, diabetes, kidney problems, hypertension, heart ailments, birth defects, black foot and multiple cancers. Three other brands – Drop Ice, Effort and Butt – were found to be unsafe due to “microbiological contamination which may cause cholera, diarrhoea, dysentery, hepatitis and typhoid etc.” Noble, Days Pure, Aqua Safe also contain unusually high quantities of sodium, which the levels of potassium found in the Al-Haider brand are also alarmingly high, according to the report. The PCRWR has urged national quality control and...

Game changer

The US-Iran understanding opens new possibilities for India and Pakistan. The entire Middle East, from Israel to Yemen and from Iraq and Iran, finds itself in an unprecedented turmoil. Aided by Egyptian and Jordanian pilots, the Saudi-led jets are pounding targets in Yemen. Iraqi forces are battling the IS militias to reestablish their writ over territories lost to forces that were born out of the Saudi-US-led charge on Syria. Top officials from Pakistan and Turkey are visibly trying to contain the consequences of the Saudi invasion of Yemen. Private entities such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and Afghanistan’s Hizb-e-Islami are vowing to shore up Saudi defense against what they see as Iranian expansionist designs. Iran on the other hand has just clinched its nuclear deal with the US-led P-5. This deal marks new realignments in the Middle East, with Tehran also offering mediation support to diffuse the crisis arising out of the Royal Kingdom’s belligerence that is cloaked by most vested interest as a conflict between Shia and Sunni Islam. The Pakistani bomb may be of some consolation to Saudi Arabia, but it remains mostly India-specific In the words of Mir Hasil Bizenjo, the de facto chief of the National Party (Balochistan), this is an Arab conflict about geo-political interests and not a sectarian dispute between Yemen’s Shia Muslims and Saudi Wahabi Muslims. Hassan Rouhani, the reformist Iranian President, has transformed Iran-West relations into a new era and appears to have ended years of Iran’s international isolation. April 2, 2015 indeed underscored a new beginning for Iran when it finally entered into an understanding over its enrichment of nuclear fissile material with the European Union (EU) and P5+1. Under the terms of deal, Iran has agreed to reduce by approximately two-thirds its installed centrifuges, meaning thereby that it would cut the number of its centrifuges from the current 19,000 to some 6,104. Only 5,060 of these centrifuges would be able to enrich...

VIP security and citizens

In a country touted as a functional democracy, it took a three-day deadline and a last-minute warning to many political VIPs to remove dozens, if not hundreds, of roadblocks placed in front of or around their residences in Karachi. Some of them may have been motivated by genuine security concerns but most of these barriers symbolised the inner sense of insecurity of those people who tirelessly claim to represent hapless and helpless citizens. Besides the obstructions the ruling elite had placed on roads, many also surround themselves with huge security walls around their palatial residences. This way, the political elite not only feel secure but also project their mighty social status. All this had happened and continues to happen in cities such as Islamabad, Lahore and Peshawar at the cost of the common people, who have to take detours to reach their homes. The trend of raising additional security walls, protective cordons and instituting multi-layered security mechanisms grew immediately after the Lal Masjid Operation in July 2007, when terrorist organisations began sowing terror in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P), Islamabad, Rawalpindi and Karachi in retaliation for what they termed revenge for the operation. These spiralling events sent the security apparatus into an unprecedented defensive mode. Officials of the apex committee for K-P/Fata even toyed with the idea of raising a physical cordon around Peshawar. Many even suggested that the city be insulated through a fortified security wall. Such an approach clearly exposed a defeatist mentality, which made the state appear in a state of retreat in the face of an encroaching nexus of militants and criminals operating out of Fata. The situation in the urban centres was even worse as VIPs had ever more state security deployed for their protection. A former interior minister, for instance, relied on at least five dozen police and FC personnel for his protection. Operation Zarb-e-Azb has reversed that siege mentality. The...

Untying the Knot by the Indian High Commissioner, Dr. TCA Raghavan

Dr. T. C. A. Raghavan, the Indian High Commissioner to Pakistan, gave his observations and comments on India-Pakistan relations in a round table discussion at the Center for Research and Security Studies (CRSS) on April 7, 2015. Noting the dramatic events that took place in 1979, such as the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the Revolution in Iran, and the hanging of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in Pakistan, Dr. Raghavan suggested that the cycle of events precipitated by these events seemed to have come full circle with the recent breakthrough in the Iran-US negotiations. He also referred to the changes taking place in South Asia, particularly in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Dr. Raghavan recalled having been told in various conversations during his stay in Pakistan that the US-Canada relationship model could serve as a benchmark for the India-Pakistan partnership. He emphasized that care and caution is of utmost importance while dealing with India-Pakistan relations. Emphasizing the importance of resolving terrorism and extremism, Dr. Raghavan asked the audience to imagine the state of India-Pakistan bilateral relations in the contra-factual situations wherein the Kargil episode of 1999 and the Mumbai terrorist attacks of 2008 had not taken place. Being inquired on the approach of the present Indian Government towards India-Pakistan relations, Dr. Raghavan said that the approach was very clear, the Government wants good relations with all the neighboring countries; in this context, he also noted the invitation extended to all the SAARC leaders for attending the oath taking ceremony of the Council of Ministers of the present Government. Referring to the new areas having strong potential for bilateral cooperation, Dr. Raghavan specifically highlighted hydro-carbon sector, health sector and tourism sector.

‘Beijing is a friend of the entire Pakistan’

Chinese officials say the Economic Corridor is not just a road, and no province will be left out. China is on the move. Its economy continues to grow at 7 percent. This translates into over a trillion dollars worth of GDP. Despite the growth, inflation in China remains under three percent. At the same time, Beijing is taking several new initiatives to enhance trade and connectivity. It has, for instance, set aside some $40 billion for the Silk Road project to supplement President Xi’s idea of “one belt one road.” More that 30 nations of and around the Asia-Pacific region have joined the $50 billion multilateral Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) bank that China has proposed. The Asian Development Bank (ADB), International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank as well as leading nations such as Germany and France have expressed support for the Bank which is designed to provide project loans to developing countries. The AIIB is expected to kick off operations by the end of this year. Accompanying the economic growth bonanza is a focused social reform and stability agenda. The Chinese Communist Party has also unleashed a severe crackdown on corruption with a commitment to punish all violators. As many as 60 minister-level officials, for instance, have been sacked and penalized in the last couple of years as part of a drive to enforce rule of law. Over 30 Generals of the Peoples Liberation Army, too, have been removed for abuse of power. As for Pakistan, despite recent noises by nationalist parties and MPs from Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa over perceived changes in the route of the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), Beijing appears to remain intensely committed to the ambitious project. The Gwadar-Kashghar route was originally planned to go through Bisima, Khuzdar, Kalat and Quetta onto to Zhob, Dera Ismail Khan, Hassan Abdal and onwards to Kashghar, but the joint committee has decided to first take segments that are free of security concerns as...

US Drone War: Monthly Report

A monthly update on the United States Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) drone strikes in Afghanistan-Pakistan border region reveals that the strikes have been halved from the previous year, and the number of fatalities has also been reduced. The CIA drone strikes are being carried out in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), where Pakistani armed forces are conducting an operation code named ‘Zarb-e-Azb since June 2014 to root out terrorist infrastructure. Last year Pakistan witnessed 25 such strikes, in which approximately 184 people got killed, with reported 4 civilians among the victims, while 40 people were injured. The Obama administration carried out more drone strikes than his predecessor George. W Bush. The CIA carried out 408 strikes since 2004, whereas the number of Obama strikes is crossing more than 360. Pakistan: CIA drone strikes   All strikes, March 2015 All strikes, 2015 to date All strikes, 2004 to date CIA drone Strikes 1 6 414 Total reported killed 3 29-41 2,445 - 3,945 Civilians reported killed 0 0 421- 960 Children reported killed 0 0 172- 207 Total reported injured 0 9-14 1,142- 1, 720   One CIA drone strike killed three people in Pakistan last month. The attack hit in Kurram agency just across the border from North Waziristan – the location of the overwhelming majority of strikes this year and in 2014. The attack hit in the Shabak area of the agency, which is close to the border with Afghanistan. Some reports had the strike hitting in Afghanistan however a Tehrik e Taliban Pakistan (TTP) statement placed the attack on the Pakistan side of the border. This TTP press release was a eulogy for the three men killed in the attack. It said Khawrey Mehsud was a senior commander in the group and had been its former leader Baitullah Mehsud‘s bodyguard. Baituallah was killed in a drone strike in Pakistan in 2009. This was the first strike in Pakistan since January 28 when six or seven people were killed in North Waziristan. There has...

CRSS Radio Reporter Wins Award for HIV/Aids Report

At an EHAD workshop, organized in Peshawar in 2014, journalists were asked to produce one investigative report on child sexual abuse, infectious disease HIV/Aids, child marriages, and many other issues. Inam Ullah, veteran reporter for the Center for Research and Security Studies (CRSS/The Center), filed a radio report on HIV/Aids, a taboo topic in Pakistan. Inam's entry was one of nearly a hundred submitted for this competition. The report, focusing on treatment, prevention and risks of HIV/Aids, delved into Khyber Pukhtunkhwa government’s initiatives to provide free treatment and counseling at major public hospitals. The report also aimed to create awareness and sensitize the public about HIV/Aids, which is no longer a deadly disease, if an infected person starts treatment in time. This report was aired on September 23, 2014 in The Center's flagship radio show, Sabawoon and simultaneously submitted to EHAD for the award competition. CRSS is pleased to announce that Inam Ullah received the first prize in the radio category. The award ceremony washeld at Marriott Islamabad on March 27, 2015 where Inam was gifted a sum of Rs. 20,000 for his outstanding reporting. The Center offers heartiest felicitations to Inam Ullah, for this incredible accomplishment in the field of journalism.

Fighting terror & calamity

What is the most effective way of fighting irregular forces of terrorism and extremism or even reacting to calamities? Is it proactive mediation and reliance on the tools of soft power i.e., good and merit-based governance as a long-term strategy, or is it through the hard power of the state alone? Does the hard power provide lasting victory over unregulated evil? Can a state succeed against crime, calamity and terror if its governance structures are cluttered in a reactive mode? Also, can a country make the right decisions if most of the political discourse on national and international issues is usually dictated more by emotions and less by rationalty. The Pakistan government’s response to the Yemen crisis offers one example of a state that lacks proactive intuition and only reacts when surrounded by crisis or hit by calamity. Most countries — including the United States, the UK, Germany — acted well ahead of time and had their citizens evacuated from Yemen without allowing fear and panic to perpetuate. Sadly, some 2,500 Pakistani citizens, as of March 30, still await evacuation and this reflects either the willful oversight of an imminent crisis or wishful optimism of the Pakistani diplomatic mission in Sanaa. Did it issue any caution or advisory, at least to those citizens who were closer to the advancing Houthi militias? The trouble in Yemen had been brewing for several years and this simmering conflict turned into a regional conflict as Saudi Arabia initiated strikes on Houthi rebels. The government apparently lost no time in blindly committing military support to the Saudi Arabian monarch during the prime minister’s specially organised tour to the Kingdom in March. The evacuation of Pakistanis stranded in Yemen was probably an afterthought. Pakistani political parties, intelligensia and the civil society at large, on the other hand, have loudly begun opposing their country’s active participation in the Saudi-led war on Yemen. They want the government to...

Fighting terror & calamity

What is the most effective way of fighting irregular forces of terrorism and extremism or even reacting to calamities? Is it proactive mediation and reliance on the tools of soft power i.e., good and merit-based governance as a long-term strategy, or is it through the hard power of the state alone? Does the hard power provide lasting victory over unregulated evil? Can a state succeed against crime, calamity and terror if its governance structures are cluttered in a reactive mode? Also, can a country make the right decisions if most of the political discourse on national and international issues is usually dictated more by emotions and less by rationalty. The Pakistan government’s response to the Yemen crisis offers one example of a state that lacks proactive intuition and only reacts when surrounded by crisis or hit by calamity. Most countries — including the United States, the UK, Germany — acted well ahead of time and had their citizens evacuated from Yemen without allowing fear and panic to perpetuate. Sadly, some 2,500 Pakistani citizens, as of March 30, still await evacuation and this reflects either the willful oversight of an imminent crisis or wishful optimism of the Pakistani diplomatic mission in Sanaa. Did it issue any caution or advisory, at least to those citizens who were closer to the advancing Houthi militias? The trouble in Yemen had been brewing for several years and this simmering conflict turned into a regional conflict as Saudi Arabia initiated strikes on Houthi rebels. The government apparently lost no time in blindly committing military support to the Saudi Arabian monarch during the prime minister’s specially organised tour to the Kingdom in March. The evacuation of Pakistanis stranded in Yemen was probably an afterthought. Pakistani political parties, intelligensia and the civil society at large, on the other hand, have loudly begun opposing their country’s active participation in the Saudi-led war on Yemen. They want the government to...

TOP STORIES

TESTIMONIALS

I am also a member of National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Information and Broadcasting. Recently, we held a meeting with the Director General of Radio Pakistan and we told them to initiate such local programs (like Constituency Hour) in regional languages to educate and inform people. Even Indian Radio can be heard in FATA which is being used for propaganda purposes and must be closed. Therefore, we should launch some standard and quality programs like CRSS that will change the taste of the listeners.

Soniya Shams

Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Peshawar