Current Projects

Euro Parliament Calls on India to Stop Rights’ Violations

The European Parliament on July 13 came out strongly with three resolutions on the human rights situation in Venezuela, Kyrgyzstan and India, all adopted with a heavy majority. The resolution on India focused on the situation in Manipur and called on the government to immediately put an end to the rights’ abuses. The resolution read as follows: “””Following recent violent clashes in the state of Manipur, India, which since May 2023 have left at least 120 people dead, 50 000 displaced and over 1 700 houses and 250 churches destroyed, Parliament strongly urges the Indian authorities to put in place all necessary measures to promptly halt the ethnic and religious violence and to protect all religious minorities. The resolution notes that intolerance towards minority communities has contributed to the current violence and that there have been concerns about politically motivated, divisive policies that promote Hindu majoritarianism in the area. The Manipur state government has also shut down internet connections and severely hindered reporting by the media, while security forces have been implicated in the recent killings, something that has further increased distrust in the authorities. MEPs call on the Indian authorities to allow independent investigations to look into the violence, to tackle impunity and to lift the internet ban. They also urge all conflicting sides to cease making inflammatory statements, re-establish trust and play an impartial role to mediate the tensions. Parliament reiterates its call for human rights to be integrated into all areas of the EU-India partnership, including in trade. MEPs also advocate for the EU-India Human Rights Dialogue to be reinforced and encourage the EU and its member states to systematically and publicly raise human rights concerns, notably on freedom of expression, religion and the shrinking space for civil society, with the Indian side at the highest level.” The European Parliament resolution on India is thus far the...

China or the US: Pakistan’s Choice

If Turkey couldn't hold on to neutrality b/w US & Russia, time is close enough for us too to be asked directly- either you are with us or with China! Pakistan is among the frontline states in the China-U.S. contest for influence in Asia. As Washington cements its strategic partnership with New Delhi, Islamabad’s growing tilt toward Beijing is raising concerns in Western capitals. Last month, the United States joined India in calling out Pakistan for terrorism, indicating a clear shift in Washington’s South Asia policy toward deprioritizing Pakistan. With India-U.S. relations entering a “transformational moment,” Pakistan’s response to the great power rivalry is becoming clearer. Despite denouncing repeatedly, the idea of joining “bloc politics,” Islamabad appears to be pivoting toward Beijing. The Discord Leaks: Pakistan Tilts to China In April, leaked U.S. documents revealed that Pakistan’s state minister for foreign affairs, Hina Rabbani Khar, had advised Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to avoid “appeasing the West” at the expense of a “real strategic partnership” with China. The memo, titled “Pakistan’s Difficult Choices,” argued that Pakistan can no longer try to maintain a “middle ground” between China and the United States. Notably, Pakistan declined two consecutive invitations to attend the United States’ Summit for Democracy – ostensibly because the events included Taiwan and excluded China – while attending similar events on “Democracy” and “Shared Human Values” in Beijing. Meanwhile, Pakistan’s Army Chief Asim Munir has visited China, while a visit to the United States is not even under discussion. Wearied by Washington’s costly security-centric approach, Islamabad’s turn toward China’s economics-driven diplomacy offers greater hope for Pakistan. Making a Choice? Despite that, there is a hesitancy to completely abandon Pakistan’s relationship with the United States. In a recent interview, Khar expressed Pakistan’s concerns about the possibility of a...

China’s New “Toolbox” for Security and Sovereignty

China’s new Foreign Relations Law is meant to guide and govern the country’s foreign policy – a de facto TOOLBOX to handle issues related to external relations. It is designed to act as a “deterrent” to sanctions and is needed urgently to safeguard national sovereignty and security. In March this year, President Xi Jinping hit out at the string of sanctions the US and its European allies have been slapping on China. In a blunt like never before tone, Xi described these measures as a means of “all-around containment, encirclement and suppression of China”, signaling a possibly harder stance against what he perceives as an effort by the United States to block China’s rise. This speech apparently set the stage for the new  Foreign Relations Law (passed on June 28) that has transformed Xi’s views in to a law in a difficult geo-political and challenging commercial environment. The law is meant to guide and govern the country’s foreign policy – a de facto TOOLBOX to handle issues related to external relations. It is designed to act as a “deterrent” to sanctions and is needed urgently to safeguard national sovereignty and security. It says Beijing has the right to “take measures to counter and restrict actions that endanger the country’s sovereignty, security, and development interests, violate international law or “fundamental norms of international relations.” It also authorises the State Council – the country’s cabinet – and the executive branches of government to come up with regulations and systems to apply the countermeasure on issues such as US-led export controls on advanced technology. It calls on state agencies charged with, executing Xi’s vision to strengthen interdepartmental coordination and cooperation to enforce the retaliatory measures. The State Council, which coordinates China’s government ministries, is authorized to “establish related working institutions.” As expected, the law drew criticism from US and European officials and experts, warning it will...

FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW- CHINA STRIKES BACK

The new law stipulates that Beijing has the right to take measures to counter and restrict actions (initiated by the West) that endanger the country’s sovereignty, security, and development interests and violate international law or fundamental norms of international relations. On June 28th, 2023, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of China passed The Foreign Relations Law. According to President Xi`s senior diplomacy advisor Wang Yi, the law aims to safeguard national sovereignty and act as a deterrent against sanctions. The new law stipulates that Beijing has the right to take measures to counter and restrict actions (initiated by the West) that endanger the country’s sovereignty, security, and development interests and violate international law or fundamental norms of international relations. The law has come into effect since July 1st and encompasses President Xi`s signature foreign policy initiatives, i.e., global security, development, and civilization. In essence, the new law is to shield itself and counter the West`s sanctions hegemony. It has been passed at a crucial time, with US-China relations at a low, especially after the US President branding President Xi as a dictator, the spy balloon saga, and China`s continued support for President Putin in Russia’s war against Ukraine. China sees ongoing hostile American efforts to suppress its development. In a recent meeting with US Secretary Blinken, President Xi told the US envoy that Washington must not hurt China`s legitimate rights and interests or deprive it of its right to development. It follows US export controls on high-tech goods and its efforts to reduce reliance on Chinese suppliers in sensitive sectors. In recent months, the US has blacklisted Chinese companies, pushed its allies to restrict the export of semiconductors and de-risk its supply chain. China has viewed this as a direct attack. To demonstrate to the US its point, China, too, has begun its sanctions. In February...

Shehbaz asks India to shun CPEC hostility

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday urged India not to create hurdles in the way of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), stressing that it would benefit the whole region, including Iran, Afghanistan, the Middle East and beyond. In a statement issued by the Prime Minister Office to commemorate the completion of 10 years since the start of the multibillion-dollar project, the prime minister vowed to double the pace of the development projects under CPEC. CPEC, a flagship mega project of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) – a brainchild of Chinese President Xi Jinping – was signed in Pakistan during the Xi’s visit at the invitation of then Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. Prime Minister Shehbaz vowed to double the pace of work as CPEC was not only meant for improving roads, rail, seaports and air routes, but it would also help in health, education and skills development areas. “CPEC is a beautiful plan to connect not only regions and areas but also people’s hearts,” Prime Minister Shehbaz said. “CPEC will have positive impacts on the people’s living standards in the region,” he added. The CPEC project had been seen with suspicion in India, as the country is not on good terms with its two neighbours – Pakistan and China. The project is seen with hostility after Narendra Modi of the Bhartya Janata Party (BJP) became the prime minister. On Tuesday, the joint statement issued at the conclusion of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit meeting said that all the members, barring India, supported the BRI to connect China with Asia and Europe and beyond. Earlier in May, Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar – host of the SCO foreign ministers meeting – had accused China of being an “expansionist”, calling CPEC an encroachment on Indian sovereign land. However, Shehbaz asked India to benefit from CPEC, instead of creating obstacles in its way. He said that the enemies of CPEC were against peace, development, and prosperity in Pakistan and the...

IED Attacks Remain a Concern in Afghanistan: UNAMA

The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) has released a report highlighting concern regarding the rise in IED (Improvised Explosive Devices) attacks. Despite an overall decline in civilian casualties since the Taliban takeover, IED attacks have increased, particularly against places of worship and the minority Hazara community. The report reveals that out of 3,774 civilian casualties recorded between August 15, 2021, and May 30, 2023, three-quarters were caused by indiscriminate IEDs in populated areas, including schools, markets, and places of worship. The majority of these casualties were attributed to the self-identified Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant – Khorasan Province (ISIL-KP), whose IED attacks significantly rose following the Taliban takeover. Notably, suicide attacks by ISIL-KP and other actors were the primary cause of IED-related civilian harm. Attacks on civilians and civilian sites have drawn condemnation from UNAMA's Fiona Frazer, who urged the de facto authorities to conduct thorough and transparent investigations into IED attacks affecting civilians. The report highlights a significant increase in civilian harm resulting from IED attacks on places of worship, particularly Shia Muslim sites, accounting for more than one-third of all civilian casualties during the reporting period. The predominantly Shia Muslim Hazara community also faced attacks in schools, streets, and public transportation, resulting in 345 casualties. To prevent further incidents, the report recommends the implementation of protective measures in places of worship, educational facilities, and Hazara Shi’a communities. These continued attacks exacerbate Afghanistan's ongoing humanitarian crisis, with victims of violence struggling to access essential support due to declining donor funding for vital services. Source:...

Relocating The TTP Will Not End Pakistan’s Terrorism Problem

Recent reports on the relocation of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants to Afghanistan raise doubts about whether this plan will effectively put an end to terrorism in the country. Several factors contribute to the skepticism surrounding the relocation and its potential outcomes. The central question revolves around how the relocation plan will ensure the monitoring and control of TTP militants once they are moved to a new location in Afghanistan. Considering the Afghan Taliban’s history of sheltering terrorists, there is no guarantee that the TTP militants will disband their local followers or abandon their pursuit of establishing a Sharia-compliant state in Pakistan, merely by their relocation in northern Afghanistan. Second, the relocation of TTP militants in Afghanistan has been reported differently by Pakistani and Afghan media, highlighting the contradictory nature of available information. While the Pakistani press claims that Pakistan will provide funds for the relocation, the Afghan press remains silent on this point and instead focuses on the potential security threats this move may pose to Afghanistan. It is important to note that the claim about Pakistan providing funds for the relocation is solely based on an anonymous source. Coincidentally, a report in the Pakistani press has highlighted an allocation of Rs 90 billion for the War on Terror. This is the highest amount of budget allocated to KP for the War on Terror in the last twelve years though KP province still remains a region highly affected by terrorism. On the other hand, a separate report by Hasht-E Subh from Afghanistan highlights the secret relocation of approximately 300 TTP fighters to Takhar province in Afghanistan. The article states that the relocation took place following an agreement between the Taliban and Pakistan, without specifying the financial aspects of the relocation. The report raises concern about the security situation in Takhar province as a result of this new...

Blinken’s Visit to Beijing-Thaw in US-China Relations?

Anthony Blinken, US Secretary of State, met with China’s President Xi Jinping. Since he started his term three years ago, it was Blinken’s first visit to Beijing. Both parties agreed to continue their diplomatic engagements and have frequent visits to explore more channels for dialogue and areas for cooperation. While there are key issues between the nations that remain unresolved, they believe that the two countries “can overcome various difficulties.” On June 18, 2023, Anthony Blinken, US Secretary of State, met with China’s President Xi Jinping. Since he started his term three years ago, it was Blinken’s first visit to Beijing. Both parties expressed their intention to have a more stable relationship and avoid escalating into a conflict. A high level of engagement between the two countries was evident at the Great Hall of the People. US President Biden and China’s President Xi met last year on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Bali, Indonesia. Both the leaders had pledged to have more frequent communication and initially planned a meeting for February. However, the spy balloon incident caused a delay. The relationship between China and the US is complex, as both hold firm positions on several issues, including Taiwan, trade, US policy towards China’s semiconductor sector, human rights, and Russia’s conflict with Ukraine. Although China declined to cooperate with the US on military-to-military channels of communication, mainly due to US sanctions, both sides agreed to continue their diplomatic engagements and have frequent visits to explore more channels for dialogue and areas for cooperation. Blinken stated that while there are key issues between the nations that remain unresolved, his “hope and expectation is we will have better communication, better engagement going forward.” Xi also expressed hope and stated that China “hopes to see a sound and steady China-US relationship” and believes that the two countries “can overcome various difficulties.” “The two...

Key Takeaway Points Arab-China Summit

The summit aimed to enhance commercial and diplomatic ties between China and Arab countries. On the first day of the conference, investment agreements worth $10 billion were signed. The investment agreements covered various sectors such as technology, agriculture, renewable energy, real estate, natural resources, and tourism On 11th June 2023, the China-Arab business conference was held in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The meeting happened amidst the expanding commercial and diplomatic relationships between Beijing and Middle Eastern nations, including a recent historic reconciliation between regional powerhouses Iran and Saudi Arabia mediated by China that has changed regional relations. The summit aimed to enhance commercial and diplomatic ties between China and Arab countries. The event brought together over 3,500 government and business officials from both sides. On the first day of the conference, investment agreements worth $10 billion were signed. The majority of the investment deals were focused on projects in Saudi Arabia or involved Saudi firms and government entities. A significant portion of the $10 billion included a $5.6 billion memorandum of understanding between the Saudi investment ministry and Human Horizons, a Chinese electric and self-driving car manufacturer. Specific deals mentioned in the statement included a $533 million agreement between AMR ALuwlaa Company and Zhonghuan International Group for an iron factory in Saudi Arabia, Also, a $500 million cooperation agreement was signed on copper mining between Saudi ASK Group and the China National Geological & Mining Corp. Major deals in Major Sectors – Technology, Agriculture, Renewable Energy, Real Estate, Natural Resources and Tourism Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan highlighted the potential in increased trade and economic ties between China and Arab countries. “This meeting is an opportunity… to build a shared future towards a new, beneficial era for our peoples,” he said. He...

TOP STORIES

TESTIMONIALS

I am also a member of National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Information and Broadcasting. Recently, we held a meeting with the Director General of Radio Pakistan and we told them to initiate such local programs (like Constituency Hour) in regional languages to educate and inform people. Even Indian Radio can be heard in FATA which is being used for propaganda purposes and must be closed. Therefore, we should launch some standard and quality programs like CRSS that will change the taste of the listeners.

Soniya Shams

Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Peshawar