Current Projects
Armed but Not Dangerous
The imminent retirement—as of now—of Chief of Army Staff General Raheel Sharif continues to attract speculation. The rumour mill and alarmist analysts are still talking about whether the general will bow out quietly or pursue some misadventure to trump the civilian Sharif. None of this gossip was quelled by his announcement early this year that he would not be seeking an extension. Those who speculate about the November decision dredge up history, citing the peculiar past of the Pakistan army when it comes to such matters. Perhaps they should give more weight to the immediate past. Pakistan’s army, the bedrock of an otherwise fragile state, may not be the most progressive of institutions. But recent developments suggest that our military leaders realise it needs to change, even if key concerns remain, said the Guardian in 2010, months after General Ashfaq Kayani had replaced General Musharraf as the chief of army staff. Unlike his predecessor, Kayani came across as a modest man of a few words, focused on military matters, even if the army stood out as the predominant stakeholder in domestic politics. He generally avoided “rhetorical flourishes or getting involved in public politics.” Most of the PML-N brigade, led by a visibly unhealthy prime minister, has been seen as preoccupied with Imran Khan. The military machinery, all the while, churns ahead with a focus on how to highlight the role it plays in Pakistan Kayani had inherited an army that reeled from the long controversial Musharraf years. His primary focus was to rehabilitate its image, contain and neutralize the bloody spate of violence and acknowledge the rank and file. Never before had a COAS focused so much energy on the welfare of the soldier as much as Kayani did. He dealt with possibly the worst multiple security crises this country ever faced, particularly the years 2009 to 2011. Despite that, recalls General Asif Yasin, a former corps commander, Gen. Kayani spent four Eids in various...
2016 Fighting Season in Afghanistan: Taliban Target Senior Ranks
A senior police chief, General Zarawar Zahid, was killed in an IED blast on Sunday in the volatile province of Nangarhar. The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack. Nangarhar has faced increasing instability as Islamic State (ISIS) militants have increased attacks in the region. Zabihullah Zmarai, a member of the provincial council, said, “Out of the 22 districts, only six are secure.” Attempting to mount a counterattack to stave off collapse of Hisarack district, Gen. Zahid visited the embattled district, where he was struck by the blast. Zahid was a well-respected officer who boasted an impressive resume that included stints in Zabul and Ghazni provinces. In recent weeks, Taliban militants have stepped up high profile attacks on high ranking Afghan officials. Last week, twin blasts outside the Ministry of Defense in Kabul killed several high ranking officials, including General Abdul Raziq, the ministry’s senior commander, Kabul’s intelligence chief, and a local district police chief. Sharif Faiz, deputy head of the Afghan National Army Support Brigade, was killed in the second blast, as a suicide bomber targeted first responders. The successful attacks on high profile targets are a costly blow to Afghan forces. Training and equipping Afghan officers is no easy task and takes years of training. Consider that fact that the United States has been engaged in the conflict in Afghanistan for the last 15 years, but even the first second lieutenant would not yet be promotable to general and staff ranks. To plug gaps and capabilities for Afghan forces during the early onset of the conflict, U.S. forces relied heavily on militia and former soviet mujahideen commanders to fill the role of company grade officers — with warlords serving as generals. The program failed as many militia commanders were incompetent, illiterate, and personal interests at times trumped national interests. The current model requires Afghan officers to graduate from the Afghan...
UN: 93 Aid Workers Abducted In Afghanistan In 2016
The United Nations has warned of a growing threat to aid workers in Afghanistan where it says millions of people are in urgent need of life-saving assistance. “I am deeply concerned that aid workers are being targeted, with 93 of our colleagues abducted since the beginning of this year,” said Stephen O'Brien, the U.N.'s emergency relief coordinator, in speaking with reporters in Kabul at the end of a visit to Afghanistan. “All parties are obliged to uphold the principles of international humanitarian law and ensure the protection of civilians and aid workers,” he said, without giving further details or identifying the nationalities of the abductees. More aid needed O'Brien also called on the international community to urgently increase its support to around 1.1 million people who are expected to be displaced internally and cross borders by the end of the year. O’Brien said the humanitarian community in Afghanistan urgently needs $150 million to respond to the “life-saving” needs for the next four months in the wake of the increase in numbers of new people on the move. “The displaced families and communities are a mix of refugees returning from Pakistan and hundreds of thousands of people who have been forced from their homes this year due to the conflict in Afghanistan,” said O’Brien. The U.N. says that more than 5,000 displaced Afghans are returning from Pakistan every day, adding to the challenges facing the humanitarian community. Afghan refugees Pakistan hosts around three million Afghan refugees, nearly half of them living there illegally, who are currently facing pressure from authorities to return to Afghanistan. O’Brien said that alarming levels of malnutrition affect 2.7 million people in Afghanistan, including 1 million children under the age of 5. He urged governments, donors and humanitarian groups to do more to tackle the crisis to prevent more than 126,000 children from dying this year. “Only 35 percent of children with severe acute...
Shanghai Pact Anti-Terror Database Lists 2,500 Suicide Bombers, 69 Groups
The Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure of Shanghai Cooperation Organization (RATS SCO) possesses data on 2,500 suicide bombers and 69 terrorist organizations, the first deputy director of Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) said Tuesday. Sergei Smirnov spoke at the 29th RATS SCO session in southern Kazakhstan. "Today we have a database of 2,500 suicide bombers and 69 organizations. We have initiated the idea of compiling a database and will decide on the formal establishment of the databank at the next [RATS] session," Smirnov said. He noted that despite the timely submission and exchange of information with the use of a comprehensive set of security services, the difficulty remains in locating suspects who change official residential registrations. This article originally appeared on www.sputniknews.com ,September 13, 2016. Original link. Disclaimer: Views expressed in the article are not necessarily supported by CRSS.
India, Afghanistan Call for End to All Support of Militants
India and Afghanistan on Wednesday called for an end to all sponsorship, support and sanctuaries to militants, including those who have committed violence in the two countries. India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Afghan President Mohammad Ashraf Ghani did not name Pakistan in their remarks, though they have previously. The neighboring country has been accused of supporting the Taliban in Afghanistan and rebels in Indian-controlled Kashmir. India offered a fresh $1 billion in aid to Afghanistan for building capacity in education, health, agriculture, energy and infrastructure, said a joint statement by the two sides. They also signed an extradition treaty. Kabul has cultivated closer ties with New Delhi in recent years as a balance to Pakistan. Ghani arrived in New Delhi on Wednesday for a two-day visit. Modi and Ghani also reaffirmed their resolve to strengthen their security and defense cooperation, but did not give any details. India already has donated three multirole Mi-35 helicopters to Afghanistan. The two sides also stressed that fast implementation of an agreement among Afghanistan, India and Iran to develop the Chabahar port in Iran would increase connectivity within the region. India said in May it would invest up to $500 million to develop the Iranian port, which India plans to use for trade with Afghanistan in the absence of a land route through Pakistan. This article originally appeared on www.voanews.com, September 14, 2016. Original link. Disclaimer: Views expressed in the article are not necessarily supported by CRSS.
Ex-Afghan Leader Attacks New U.S. Combat Rules
Former Afghan President Hamid Karzai has sharply criticized new authorities giving the U.S. military greater freedom to fight Taliban insurgents, saying they were a further erosion of the country's sovereignty. In an interview, Karzai, who continues to exert considerable behind-the-scenes influence on Afghan politics, also called on the Islamist militant movement to be more realistic in demands that have hampered progress in peace talks. His comments on American involvement in the war were at odds with the government of his successor, President Ashraf Ghani, which has welcomed U.S. political and military support. "How could the U.S. president authorize U.S. troops to launch attacks on their own in Afghanistan?" Karzai said, referring to Barack Obama's June decision to alter the rules of engagement for the American military. "Don't we have a government here? Aren't we a sovereign country?" The new authorities, which U.S. officials say were agreed with the Afghan government, affect ground operations where U.S. troops provide support to Afghan forces as well as air combat, and Karzai has long been critical of U.S. air strikes in Afghanistan, be they by fighter jets, helicopters or drones. He would ban them altogether, even though the Afghan armed forces, struggling to contain the insurgency, say they could not cope without support from the skies and want more. The former leader's opposition reflects broader unease among Afghans who believe innocent people have been killed in air attacks targeting militants, unease that may grow with new powers granted to the U.S. military. The U.S. says its air strikes support Afghan operations and it takes extreme care to avoid civilian casualties, despite incidents such as the bombing of a Medecins Sans Frontieres hospital in Kunduz last year in which 42 people died. Calling Afghanistan the victim of a 21st century version of the "Great Game" between competing powers on the 19th century borders of British India, Karzai...
Sustaining Afghan-Pakistan ties
For some time now, Pak-Afghan relations are in reverse gear. The newly announced tripartite talks to be initiated shortly among Afghanistan, India and US have further exacerbated the situation. The initial two years of the presidency of Ashraf Ghani witnessed a qualitative change in the fractured bilateral relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan. He took bold decisions to undo Karzai’s pro-India policies. He turned down the Indian offer to supply weapons to Afghanistan. He declared his intention to send military cadets for training to Pakistan. Despite domestic opposition, he secured an intelligence-sharing MOU between Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and Afghanistan’s National Directorate of Security (NDS). In addition, he worked on developing a regional strategy for Afghan stability. He connected himself with all neighbouring states, with high or low stakes in peace. He called on the leadership – from Azerbaijan to India and China – in this regard. His narrative prioritised reconciliation with the Taliban to reconciliation over defeating or eliminating them. More importantly, he accepted Pakistan’s central role in this pursuit. In Pakistan, he further built special rapport with General Raheel Sharif, with the full support of the civilian government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. President Ghani lavishly praised Pakistan for “efforts in paving the ground for peace and reconciliation “ in Afghanistan. He cited two major suicide attacks which helped bring the countries closer – one in Yahyakhel (Afghanistan) in November 2014 that left nearly 50 people dead, and the second a Taliban massacre at Peshawar (Pakistan) in December 2014 that killed 153 persons, mostly children. The fundamental changes President Ghani introduced in Afghan foreign policy alarmed India. Earlier in 2011, India and Afghanistan had signed a strategic partnership agreement, which called for training of Afghan military personnel by India. Pakistan then showed its...
We are losing Kashmir to Islam: Ten ways to Counter Radicalisation in India
Let's think over some points. One, Hindu Pandits were expelled from Kashmir but they, we, did not fight back or become suicide bombers. So, is cowardice built into the Indian mindset? The Quran and Hadiths (traditions of Prophet Muhammad) will not change. So, is there a way for the Indian state to introduce change among Muslims? Two, the jihadi threat to India will not end over the next decade because: a) It is backed by Pakistan where jihadi groups will become part of the state much like Hezbollah and Hamas and b) Jihadis will likely surge in Bangladesh as the Islamist Opposition is bound to return to power at some point. Three, Jihadism is an offshoot of the failing international state system built from the 1648 Westphalian Peace Treaty and anchored since 1945 by the UN. Since there is no reform in the UN, parts of the world will remain unstable. Four, jihadism partially originates from the Middle East where jihadi groups will grow because there is no joint effort by big powers to contain it. Five, there is a worrying template: militants from Afghan jihad went on to establish jihadi groups in the Middle East; militants from Syria will do the same in parts of the world. Six, India has been witnessing "mini jihadisms" — in the form of bomb blasts, or the cutting off of TJ Joseph's hands in Kerala — ever since the beheading of Guru Tegh Bahadur in Delhi for refusing to convert to Islam. In 1901, US President William McKinley was assassinated by a refugee who was inspired by a philosophy. Jihadism is rooted in a philosophy. Islam is a philosophy, a religion, a system of ideas, an ideology, a type of politics, a movement of ideas. As an article published earlier on Firstpost, Islamism is Islam's methodology. Jihadism is the weaponised version of Islamism. Peacefully and violently, it seeks to introduce Shari'a code in our life. India is already a Shari'a-compliant state in the matters of Muslim marriage, divorce, inheritance and waqf which affect our justice system...
Modi’s Provocations Raise Risks for India
After reluctant attempts to revitalize Indo-Pak relations, Narendra Modi, now in his third year as Indian prime minister, has lost patience and switched to the expected hardline tone of hostility. The latest example is an Indian government statement made days ago, in which it announced it would increase the compensation for civilian victims of terror from 300,000 rupees ($4,468) to 500,000. More importantly, Kashmiris on the Pakistani side of the border can claim this compensation, too. This is not the only provocation. Another was his Independence Day address on August 15, and he said, "From the ramparts of the Red Fort, I want to express my gratitude to some people - the people of Balochistan, Gilgit, and Pak-occupied Kashmir - for the way they wholeheartedly thanked me." Analysts see the political push as coming from a small team filled by influential ministers and people who are the veterans of the "cold war" with Pakistan. Some are members of the National Executive of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, a right-wing organization that provides ideological support to Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party. This risky gesture is not supported by everyone in the Indian government. Outstanding reservations come from his intelligence chiefs and the external affairs ministry. Why would Modi choose to publicly reference Balochistan when his country kept denying an Indian role there? Even on Kashmir, why would he be so provocative when the Pakistani response will inevitably draw world attention at a time his government is trying to prevent the issue being internationalized? The answer can be traced to recent events in India-controlled Kashmir, which has been hit by massive protests, violence and death in the last 50 days. The crisis is the result of the death of Burhan Wani, a young Hizbul Mujahideen commander from south Kashmir's Tral area. He and two associates were cornered and killed by Indian security forces on July 8. The news of Wani's death immediately triggered...
Pakistan extends stay of Afghan refugees
In a politically significant move, Pakistan on Friday extended the stay of Afghan refugees till March, 2017. The move by Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif comes against the backdrop of charges and counter-charges by Islamabad and Kabul on a variety of subjects. Mr. Sharif’s office put up a brief, three-paragraph statement that said: “Afghans are our brothers and very dear to us. Adequate and concrete steps will be ensured for facilitation of Afghan refugees living in Pakistan,” he said. The Cabinet has approved the `Extension of the Proof Registration (PoR) Cards and Tripartite Agreement in respect of Registered Afghan Refugees’ till March next year. Mr. Sharif also directed the Ministry of States and Frontier Regions to hold broad-based consultations to address concerns of the refugees. This article appeared on http://m.thehindu.com. Original link.
TOP STORIES
TESTIMONIALS
“
I am also a member of National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Information and Broadcasting. Recently, we held a meeting with the Director General of Radio Pakistan and we told them to initiate such local programs (like Constituency Hour) in regional languages to educate and inform people. Even Indian Radio can be heard in FATA which is being used for propaganda purposes and must be closed. Therefore, we should launch some standard and quality programs like CRSS that will change the taste of the listeners.