Current Projects
Afghanistan in Talks With UAE Companies For $6b Infrastructure Projects
Negotiations are underway between the Afghan government and some companies in United Arab Emirates to attract an investment of $6 billion in infrastructure projects, it has been reported. The officials in the Ministry of Energy and Water of Afghanistan have said Afghanistan requires a total of $9 billion investment in the energy sector. Water and Energy Minister Ali Ahmad Osmani told reporters in UAE that the donor partners of Afghanistan including the United States Agency for International Development have made a commitment of $2 billion. “The fund gap is about $5-6 billion in all infrastructure projects,” Osmani told reporters after the conclusion of a summit in Dubai. Osmani further added that Afghanistan is also in discussions with a few UAE companies for some of its gas, solar and hydro projects. According to the officials, the power generated from Afghanistan could be even exported to neighbouring countries like India and Pakistan, home to a 1 billion-plus population. The latest attempts by Afghan government with the support of its international allies to attract foreign investments in energy sector of the country came as efforts are underway to boost the domestic income of the country, specifically through investments on natural resources of Afghanistan. The Afghan government signed over 80 mining contracts with the private sector earlier last month in a bid to boost the extraction of mines and prevent illegal extraction of the mining. This article originally appeared on www.khaama.com, September 20, 2016. Original link. Disclaimer: Views expressed in the article are not necessarily supported by CRSS.
India's 007, Former Super Spy, Is Shaping Modi's Foreign Policy
He spent seven years undercover in Pakistan, recruited rebels as informants in disputed Kashmir, and once disguised himself as a rickshaw driver to infiltrate a militant group inside India’s holiest Sikh temple. Now some consider Ajit Doval the most powerful person in India after Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Modi picked Doval as his National Security Advisor, a position that holds more sway than the ministers of defense and foreign affairs. It puts Doval in charge of talks with arch-rival Pakistan. He visits arms manufacturers to discuss strategic capabilities, and orchestrates the response to militant attacks, liaising daily with Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar, the nation’s top diplomat. Since Doval took the job, he has supported a nationalist agenda while adopting a tougher line against hostile neighbors. That has growing economic ramifications as China funds a $45 billion trade corridor through Pakistan that bypasses India and as both China and India eye resource-rich neighbors in central Asia like Afghanistan. “Every strategic issue in this region involves security in a way that it doesn’t in other regions,” says R. K. Sawhney, a former director general of military intelligence who’s known Doval for nearly two decades. “As the profile of the country grows, the profile of the national security advisor grows.” Short, trim and bespectacled, Doval shuns the limelight and rarely appears in public. His office said he wasn’t available for an interview. Six people who have known him personally for years—some of whom requested not to be identified because he dislikes publicity—said Doval is overseeing India’s most delicate diplomatic issues. Shortly after taking office, Modi sent Doval as his special envoy to Afghanistan and brought him on his first foreign trip to Bhutan. He’s also special representative in charge of talks with China over a disputed border, a task made more difficult as China plans to invest millions into transportation links through Kashmir, an...
India’s 007, Former Super Spy, Is Shaping Modi’s Foreign Policy
He spent seven years undercover in Pakistan, recruited rebels as informants in disputed Kashmir, and once disguised himself as a rickshaw driver to infiltrate a militant group inside India’s holiest Sikh temple. Now some consider Ajit Doval the most powerful person in India after Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Modi picked Doval as his National Security Advisor, a position that holds more sway than the ministers of defense and foreign affairs. It puts Doval in charge of talks with arch-rival Pakistan. He visits arms manufacturers to discuss strategic capabilities, and orchestrates the response to militant attacks, liaising daily with Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar, the nation’s top diplomat. Since Doval took the job, he has supported a nationalist agenda while adopting a tougher line against hostile neighbors. That has growing economic ramifications as China funds a $45 billion trade corridor through Pakistan that bypasses India and as both China and India eye resource-rich neighbors in central Asia like Afghanistan. “Every strategic issue in this region involves security in a way that it doesn’t in other regions,” says R. K. Sawhney, a former director general of military intelligence who’s known Doval for nearly two decades. “As the profile of the country grows, the profile of the national security advisor grows.” Short, trim and bespectacled, Doval shuns the limelight and rarely appears in public. His office said he wasn’t available for an interview. Six people who have known him personally for years—some of whom requested not to be identified because he dislikes publicity—said Doval is overseeing India’s most delicate diplomatic issues. Shortly after taking office, Modi sent Doval as his special envoy to Afghanistan and brought him on his first foreign trip to Bhutan. He’s also special representative in charge of talks with China over a disputed border, a task made more difficult as China plans to invest millions into transportation links through Kashmir, an...
Indian Factor in Afghanistan
For the past 10 years or so, India has been fishing in the troubled waters of Afghanistan for a central role and to marginalize Pakistan in the final settlement of the Afghan issue. Despite its historical relations, bolstered by a decade-long Hamid Karzai’s pro-India policies and its surging ability to extend economic assistance, India did not really succeed in its mission. Even the signing of Strategic Partnership Agreement in 2011 did not ensure Indian primacy to the extent that Pakistan should feel squeezed and its interests crashed beyond repair. Now that President Ashraf Ghani in his visit to New Delhi has completely reversed his two-year-old policies of depending on Pakistan rather than on India, Pakistan is deniably nervous. Civilian and military establish are denouncing the move as a grave security threat for Pakistan. The US government and Afghanistan jointly agreed that India could play a bigger role in Afghanistan under a trilateral framework. India was already providing weapons, raising the fighting capacity of the Afghan Army and the National Police against Taliban groups and ISIS. To this effect, a conclusive statement came at the India-US Strategic Commercial dialogue in Delhi on August 29, 2016 from Secretary of State John Kerry. He announced that in September the United States, India and Afghanistan would finally hold a trilateral dialogue in New York this month. For those who have been watching Indian maneuverings during the decades-long government of President Hamid Karzai and Pakistan’s continued failure to assuage Afghan’s concerns regarding Islamabad efforts to persuade Taliban groups to remain engaged in national reconciliation process aimed at reduction of violence and establishing lasting peace in Afghanistan, the tripartite agreement is not a big surprise. With Quadrilateral Coordination Group (QCG) of Afghanistan, Pakistan, the United States and China dead, and no possibility of all Taliban groups minus Hekmat Gulbadeen Yar group...
Prepare for The Worst: The Indian State Is In Retreat In Kashmir
In case anyone hasn’t cottoned on yet, let us say up front: This is not a reprise of 2010. The daring attack at Uri on Sunday should make that clear. Sadly, one reason it happened is that those in authority have cussedly refused to accept the seriousness of the situation in Kashmir; internal and external factors are not mutually exclusive. We have stumbled, blinkered if not blindfolded, into the fog of war. The demonstrations across Kashmir since July 8 were only one strain of a complex development that is still in its early stages. Sadly, top functionaries of the state, the Army, home ministry, the intelligence setup and the Opposition have viewed the events as no more than a repeat of 2010. In fact, what we have witnessed in Kashmir is the overture to a dark opera that will unveil scenes from hell as it progresses from act to frightening act. I hope this prediction is wrong, but it is time to examine the worst-case scenario: A repeat of what happened from 1962 to 1965, compressed into a crushing punch. During those years, Chinese troops advanced into Indian territory in 1962, the Valley erupted in uproar a year later, Pakistan intensely shelled the Ceasefire Line (now the Line of Control) from July 1964, and launched Operation Gibraltar a year later. That operation was an attempt to take over Kashmir through coordinated action by infiltrators, war manoeuvres by the Pakistan Army and by ordinary Kashmiris who Pakistani strategists hoped would rise in revolt. It did not work. But there are at least three reasons why current Pakistani strategists might want to try again. One, China is backing them now; Bhutto’s wooing of the dragon from 1963 on has paid off richly. Two, the past two months must have convinced them that the Kashmiris will revolt this time — indeed, already have. Three, they may think that the West is on board, based on recent noises from the US media and the UN. Upping the ante through Balochistan is an ambitious gambit, but the finest...
Surgical Strikes Post-Uri?
The writer heads the independent Centre for Research and Security Studies, Islamabad and is author of Pakistan: Pivot of Hizbut Tahrir’s Global Caliphate Within hours of the Uri attack, many Indians began drumming up the idea of surgical strikes into Pakistan. This chorus takes one back to the outrage that the November 26, 2008 Mumbai attacks had caused across India. Then, the tone and tenor that most Indians, including some of their best writers such C Raja Mohan, deployed was one of punishing lessons for Pakistan through surgical strikes. And this forces me to recall a conversation I had with one senior military official. Then I had dismissed this as a typical propaganda against President Asif Ali Zardari. But the new situation prompts me to place this conversation on record, particularly because ex foreign minister Khursid Kasuri too narrated an encounter along the same lines. One late evening in early December on that year, President Zardari summoned a meeting with prime minister Yousuf Raza Gillani and the army chief General Ashfaq Kayani. The subject being the furious Indian mood. At one point, the president threw a question at both Kayani and Gillani; “what if we allowed the Indians a few symbolic strikes at certain insignificant places. This could help in cooling down their rage,” the official had recounted. A baffled General Kayani, the official said, looked at Gillani for his opinion. “I think this could be counter-productive for us, politically unwise,” Gilani said. Emboldened by this, Kayani finally spoke out; Mr President, how can we afford this politically. A single shot fired from across the border would amount to declaration of war and my own army officers, our people will lynch us if did not respond to it. With this the meeting came to an abrupt end. Once in the car, the embittered army chief called up the chief and asked him to scramble jets for a round-the-clock aerial patrol of the eastern border regions. The near corroboration of this...
Responding to a Dangerous Time
Following joint analysis has been penned by Pakistan's three former foreign secretaries Inam ul Haq, Riaz Hussain Khokhar, Riaz Mohammad Khan, and Mahmud Durrani, retired major general an ex-national security advisor. It resonates most of common sentiment across the country and CRSS is therefore reproducing for the benefit of the larger readership. Pakistan is facing an exceptionally dangerous challenge with aggressive rhetoric and threats from India and Afghanistan and hostile narratives gaining resonance in Washington. Failing to suppress the sustained uprising in India-held Kashmir, the Modi government has intensified its smear campaign against Pakistan in yet another attempt to portray the Kashmiri protest as Pakistan-inspired terrorism. Following the attack on the Uri Indian army camp, India may heat up the Line of Control (LoC) to detract attention from its atrocities in the Valley. Pakistan should even be ready for worse. In this trying situation, Pakistan can rely on diplomatic support from China and friends in the Islamic world. But much depends on our own defence preparedness and our diplomacy. We need to devise a policy response that helps reduce the threat without giving the Kashmiris a feeling of a let-down. First we must address our vitiated relations with Kabul and Washington which have nosedived since the collapse of the quadripartite process. Regardless of the grave policy errors made since its intervention in Afghanistan, much like those made later in Iraq, Washington has chosen to blame Pakistan for its woes in Afghanistan. Both Washington and Kabul believe that sanctuaries in Pakistan sustain the Afghan Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan. Our well-intentioned commitment to nudge the Taliban towards reconciliation, bring them to the negotiating table and our apparent eagerness to play a role have turned us into a Taliban accomplice. It is time to rethink our Taliban policy. We must make a clear policy declaration that Pakistan cannot take...
No Morality Merchants in IOK
Despite the ongoing unprecedented oppressive Indian brutalities against Kashmiri youth and women in the Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK), major global powers have not condemned the Narendra Modi government. So far, the killing of over 100 persons, blinding of hundreds of young people and injuring of over 4000 young and old people have largely failed to receive world attention and sympathy. The indifference is disquieting. Is it because of the economic power of India that the world has chosen to ignore the massive violence of human rights or the international community is not fully convinced that Kashmiris have the inalienable right to decide about their future. In Pakistan, successive governments have been accused of not pursuing consistent global support campaign to flag the Indian cruelty against the Kashmiri youth. While multiple factors exist for lapse on part of our successive governments, some basic elements, which caused sizeable global support for similar human rights violations, are missing in case of IOK agitation. In this context, it will be interesting to delve into the important elements posted by Clifford Bob in his essay entitled The Merchants of Morality (Foreign Policy 129(2002): 36-45) to identify what factors have impeded the genuine suffering of Kashmiris from reaching a broader audience in the “harsh Darwinian marketplace” of “global injustices”. The notion that a cause must compete for the World’s sympathy, money, and attention represents a troubling and perplexing irony, in the words of Bob (2002), because the most dire and troubling crises are never the ones with the most widespread reception, lest they “distort their principles” and “alienate their constituencies” to appease “self-interested donors”. Bob cites the prominence of the Tibetan cause as opposed to that of the Uighurs, wherein both nations are allegedly subsumed by China, but only one of these two, which is personified by the Dalai Lama, draws large media reception and resonance....
Pakistan and Afghanistan Fight Terrorism, Boost Trade
Pakistan and Afghanistan are co-operating on a number of projects aimed at encouraging development and trade and restoring peace in the region. The most recent project approved by Pakistani authorities is the Peshawar-Kabul Expressway, Pakistani Foreign Ministry spokesman Nafees Zakaria told Pakistan Forward. When completed, the expressway will stretch 276km between Peshawar and Kabul, according to the Pakistani National Highway Authority (NHA). The highway will eliminate a missing link between Afghanistan and the Pakistani seaport of Karachi. A smaller road does connect the cities now, but the future expressway will have four lanes, according to the NHA. Pakistan already has started building a two-lane (dual carriageway) highway almost entirely in Afghanistan, between Jalalabad and the Torkham border crossing, NHA spokesman Kashif Zaman said, adding that the highway, when complete, will replace a single-lane Jalalabad-Torkham road that dates back to 2006. "Such co-operation is a pre-requisite for fruitful political engagement," said Imtiaz Gul, executive director of the Islamabad-based Centre for Research and Security Studies. "Roads bring people together." The countries are major trading partners. Pakistan is the largest importer of Afghan goods, buying US $188m (Rs. 19.6 billion) worth in 2014, according to the World Trade Organisation. That same year, Afghanistan bought US $1.3 billion (Rs. 135.9 billion) of Pakistani merchandise. The countries plan to raise their annual bilateral trade to US $5 billion (Rs. 522.5 billion) by 2018, Pakistani Prime Minister Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif confirmed last November in Islamabad to visiting Afghan Minister of Finance Eklil Ahmad Hakimi. "Pakistan believes that a peaceful, prosperous and progressive Afghanistan is in the best interest of the country and the region," Nawaz Sharif said at the time. "Pakistan will extend all possible support to Afghanistan ... to consolidate a long-term bilateral and regional...
Coordinated Bombs in Kabul Kill Senior Afghan Officials at Defense Ministry
A pair of coordinated Taliban bombings targeted the Afghan Defense Ministry in a crowded neighborhood of Kabul on Monday, officials said, killing at least 24 people and wounding dozens, among them senior security officials. Sediq Sediqqi, a spokesman for the Interior Ministry, said an army general and a police colonel in charge of the area’s security were among the dead. Other officials said the deputy director of President Ashraf Ghani’s elite protection force had also been killed. At least 50 people were wounded, Mr. Sediqqi said. A spokesman for the Health Ministry put that number at 91. Hours later, just before midnight, a third explosion shook much of the city. Witnesses said that a car bomb had exploded outside a guesthouse near Kabul Bank, in the downtown Shar-e Naw neighborhood, and that gunmen had then tried to enter the house. Police special forces rushed to the scene, and sporadic gunfire could be heard. The Defense Ministry is near a crowded bazaar along the Kabul River, and the earlier explosions happened just as official hours were ending and government employees were heading home. The presidential palace and several other government agencies are also in the area. Mohammad Radmanish, a Defense Ministry spokesman, said both blasts had been suicide bombings. The first bomber detonated his explosives by a bridge outside the entrance to the ministry around 3:30 p.m. “When people and security forces arrived for help, the second attacker blew himself up among the crowd,” Mr. Radmanish said. Zabihullah Mujahid, a Taliban spokesman, said in a statement to the news media that his group was responsible for the explosions. The Taliban’s statement said that the first blast had been caused by placed explosives and that the second one had been a suicide bombing. The bombings were the latest in a summer-long wave of attacks on government or Western targets in the capital, including a complex attack by gunmen with suicide vests on the American University that killed...
TOP STORIES
TESTIMONIALS
“
I am also a member of National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Information and Broadcasting. Recently, we held a meeting with the Director General of Radio Pakistan and we told them to initiate such local programs (like Constituency Hour) in regional languages to educate and inform people. Even Indian Radio can be heard in FATA which is being used for propaganda purposes and must be closed. Therefore, we should launch some standard and quality programs like CRSS that will change the taste of the listeners.